Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + AT Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2022 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (8) TMI 1321 - AT - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues:
1. Condonation of delay in filing the Appeal against the Order dated 05th May, 2022 passed by National Company Law Tribunal.
2. Computation of limitation for filing the Appeal - Date of knowledge of the Appellant vs. date of passing of the order by the Adjudicating Authority.

Issue 1 - Condonation of Delay:
The Appellant filed an application for Condonation of Delay in filing the Appeal against the Order dated 05th May, 2022. The Appellant argued that the Appeal was filed within 30 days from the date the Appellant received the copy of the Impugned Order, which was sent by the Liquidator. However, the Respondent contended that the Appeal was filed beyond 30 days and after about 60 days, exceeding the condonation limit of 15 days as permitted by Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Tribunal noted that the Appeal was filed on 04th July, 2022, beyond the condonable delay period, and hence dismissed the Delay Condonation Application.

Issue 2 - Computation of Limitation:
The key question was whether the computation of limitation for filing the Appeal should start from the date of knowledge of the Appellant or from the date of passing of the order by the Adjudicating Authority. The Hon'ble Supreme Court clarified in previous judgments that the period of limitation for filing an Appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code commences from the date when the order was pronounced by the Adjudicating Authority. The Court emphasized that the time taken by the Court to provide the appellant with a certified copy should be excluded from the limitation period. The Court highlighted that the IBC mandates diligence on the part of aggrieved parties to file appeals promptly without awaiting a free copy. The Court rejected the argument that limitation should start from the date of knowledge of the Appellant, emphasizing the need for timely resolution and adherence to the statutory limitation periods.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal, guided by the Supreme Court judgments, dismissed the Appeal as it was filed beyond the permissible delay period. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory limitation periods in filing appeals under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, starting from the date of pronouncement of the order by the Adjudicating Authority. The Tribunal's decision was based on the established legal principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, ensuring timely compliance with statutory provisions.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates