Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2015 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (8) TMI 1571 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Eligibility of the assessee for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act.
2. Applicability of Section 80P(4) to the assessee.
3. Classification of the assessee as a cooperative society or a cooperative bank.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Eligibility for Deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i):
The primary issue revolves around whether the assessee, a cooperative society registered under the Karnataka Souhardha Cooperative Act, 1997, is entitled to a deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2010-11. The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 49,56,911, which the Assessing Officer (AO) denied on the grounds that the assessee operates as a cooperative bank, thereby falling under the purview of Section 80P(4).

2. Applicability of Section 80P(4):
Section 80P(4), introduced by the Finance Act, 2006, states that the provisions of Section 80P shall not apply to any cooperative bank other than a primary agricultural credit society or a primary cooperative agricultural and rural development bank. The AO argued that the assessee functions like a banking institution, accepting deposits and lending money to its members, and thus should not be eligible for the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). The AO's interpretation was based on the activities and financial structure of the assessee, which he considered akin to a banking institution.

3. Classification as Cooperative Society or Cooperative Bank:
The CIT(A) overturned the AO's decision, holding that the assessee is a cooperative society and not a cooperative bank. This decision was based on the Tribunal's ruling in the case of Bangalore Commercial Transport Coop. Society Ltd., where it was held that Section 80P(4) applies only to cooperative banks and not to credit cooperative societies. The CIT(A) agreed with the assessee's submission that the AO erred in treating it as a commercial banking institution.

The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, reiterating that the legislative intent behind Section 80P(4) was to bring cooperative banks on par with commercial banks for taxation purposes, and not to affect credit cooperative societies. The Tribunal referenced the CBDT Circular No. 133/06/2007-TPL dated 9th May 2007, which clarified that Section 80P(4) does not apply to cooperative societies that are not cooperative banks.

Relevant Case Laws and Tribunal Observations:
- Bangalore Commercial Transport Coop. Society Ltd. Case: The Tribunal held that Section 80P(4) is applicable only to cooperative banks and not to credit cooperative societies. The Tribunal emphasized the distinction between cooperative banks and cooperative societies, noting that the latter cannot perform banking activities like issuing cheques, demand drafts, or acting as clearing agents.
- Gujarat High Court in CIT Vs. Jafari Momin Vikas Co-op Credit Society Ltd.: The court ruled that Section 80P(4) does not apply to credit cooperative societies, and the exclusion clause of Section 80P(4) is applicable only to cooperative banks.
- Karnataka High Court in CIT v. Sri Biluru Gurubasava Pattina Sahakari Sangha Niyamitha Bagalkot: The court upheld that a cooperative society, not being a cooperative bank, is entitled to the benefits under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).

Conclusion:
The Tribunal concluded that the assessee, being a cooperative society and not a cooperative bank, is entitled to the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order of the CIT(A) was upheld, affirming that the provisions of Section 80P(4) do not apply to the assessee. The judgment reinforces the distinction between cooperative societies and cooperative banks, emphasizing that the legislative intent was to exclude only cooperative banks from the benefits of Section 80P, not credit cooperative societies.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates