Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2018 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (8) TMI 2145 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
Appeal by Revenue challenging Order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding determination of Arms Length Price and transfer pricing analysis for Assessment Year 2010-11.

Analysis:
The Revenue raised substantial questions of law regarding the determination of Arms Length Price by the assessing authority and the direction to file the case back to the TPO/AO for considering management fees and global sale and marketing activity fees as part of operating cost. The Tribunal found that the assessee had multiple international transactions involving various charges and payments to associated enterprises. It concluded that all international transactions with revenue receipt from and payment to associated enterprises should be clubbed together for analysis under TNMM. The Tribunal directed the TPO to determine the ALP of global sale and marketing activity fees instead of considering it NIL. The Court referred to a recent judgment stating that unless there is an evident error in the Tribunal's findings, appeals under Section 260-A of the Act are not maintainable.

The Court emphasized that substantial questions of law should involve interpretations of DTAA provisions, Income Tax Act, or significant tax issues like BEPS or treaty shopping, not mere comparability or filter application disputes. It clarified that dissatisfaction with Tribunal findings is insufficient to invoke Section 260-A. The Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, stating no substantial question of law arose in the case. The judgment highlighted the importance of quick resolution in international trade cases and reiterated the standards for raising substantial questions of law in appeals.

Therefore, the Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, finding no grounds for invoking Section 260-A and emphasizing the need for substantial legal issues in such appeals. The judgment underlined the significance of proper comparability analysis in transfer pricing cases and the limited scope for challenging Tribunal findings without clear legal questions involved.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates