Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2013 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2013 (6) TMI 930 - AT - Income Tax

Issues Involved:
1. Classification of transactions in shares as business transactions or short-term capital gains.
2. Disallowance of legal expenses.

Summary:

Issue 1: Classification of Transactions in Shares
The primary contention was whether the transactions of purchase and sale of shares by the assessee should be classified as business transactions or short-term capital gains. The assessee argued that the shares were held as investments, not as stock-in-trade, and cited previous assessments where similar transactions were treated as investments. The AO, relying on CBDT Circular No. 4 of 2007 and various Supreme Court decisions, treated the transactions as business activities, noting the substantial volume and regularity of transactions, lack of dividend income, and the intention to earn profits. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, but the ITAT reversed this, emphasizing that the intention to resell at a profit is not decisive, and prior assessments had accepted similar transactions as investments. The ITAT concluded that the shares were held as investments, allowing the assessee's appeal on this issue.

Issue 2: Disallowance of Legal Expenses
The second issue was the disallowance of legal expenses amounting to Rs. 11,01,887/-. The assessee claimed these expenses were incurred to protect his voting rights and safeguard his position as Chairman of M/s A.B. Hotels Ltd., which indirectly affected his other business interests. The AO and CIT(A) disallowed the expenses, stating no direct nexus to earned income. The ITAT, however, allowed the claim, citing the necessity to protect the assessee's business reputation and interests, referencing the Supreme Court judgment in CIT v. Delhi Safe Deposit Co. Ltd., which allowed similar expenses as deductible.

Conclusion:
The ITAT allowed the appeal, reversing the CIT(A)'s decisions on both issues, recognizing the transactions as investments and permitting the deduction of legal expenses.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates