9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Jurisdiction of the court in Madras regarding dishonored cheques drawn on a foreign bank account in Singapore. Detailed Analysis: The case involved a complaint against the petitioners, who were directors of a company in Singapore, for dishonoring cheques drawn on a foreign bank account. The complainant alleged offenses under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioners contended that since the cheques were drawn at a foreign bank in Singapore, the Madras court lacked jurisdiction over the matter. However, the complainant argued that the place of payment determines the jurisdiction, and as the complainant's company was situated in Madras, the cheques were presented for collection there. The court examined Sections 135, 136, and 137 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which establish that if an instrument is made in accordance with Indian law, subsequent actions in India are valid. The court emphasized that accepting the petitioners' argument would create chaos for Indian companies dealing with foreign entities, as it would prevent them from receiving payments for work done under contracts with foreign companies. Therefore, the court dismissed the petitioners' contention, ruling that the Madras court had jurisdiction over the case. In conclusion, the court upheld its jurisdiction over the case involving dishonored cheques drawn on a foreign bank account in Singapore, emphasizing the importance of Indian law provisions in ensuring that Indian companies can seek redress in cases of dishonored instruments made in accordance with Indian law.
|
