Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AAR Income Tax - 2008 (12) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2008 (12) TMI 27 - AAR - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Eligibility of the applicant for deduction under section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act.
2. Nature of the 'swapping premium' and its qualification for deduction under section 36(1)(viii).

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Eligibility of the Applicant for Deduction under Section 36(1)(viii):

Background and Legislative History:
The applicant, a Government company, sought advance ruling on whether the swapping premium qualifies as profit derived from the business of providing long-term finance and if it is eligible for deduction under section 36(1)(viii). The section allows a deduction of up to 40% of profits derived from providing long-term finance for industrial, agricultural, or infrastructural development, provided it is carried to a special reserve.

Eligibility Criteria:
- The applicant is a public sector undertaking registered as a Non-Banking Financial Company by the Reserve Bank of India.
- The company's main objective is to provide long-term finance for electricity projects, contributing to industrial, agricultural, and infrastructural development.
- The applicant has consistently been allowed deductions under section 36(1)(viii) in the past, confirming its eligibility.

Assessment Year in Question:
For the assessment year 2004-05, the applicant claimed a deduction on Rs.170.58 crores received as swapping premium. The AO restricted the deduction, arguing that the swapping premium does not have a direct and immediate nexus with the business of providing long-term finance.

Legal Definitions and Interpretations:
- Section 36(1)(viii) defines eligible entities and the nature of long-term finance.
- The applicant qualifies as a financial corporation since it is a public company and a Government company under the Companies Act, 1956.
- The applicant's business of providing long-term finance for rural electrification aligns with the objectives of industrial and agricultural development.

Conclusion:
The applicant is an eligible entity for deduction under section 36(1)(viii) as it provides long-term finance for industrial and agricultural development, and its status as a financial corporation is undisputed.

2. Nature of the 'Swapping Premium' and Its Qualification for Deduction:

Applicant's Argument:
- The swapping premium is derived from the business of providing long-term finance.
- It is a result of rescheduling interest rates on existing long-term loans due to market conditions.
- The premium has a direct and immediate nexus with the business operations.

Revenue's Argument:
- The swapping premium is a one-time receipt for converting loans and does not have a direct nexus with long-term finance.
- It is considered as 'other income' and not income from lending operations.
- The premium is compensation for renegotiation, not derived directly from the business of long-term finance.

Judicial Precedents:
- The term 'derived from' requires a direct nexus between the income and the source.
- The Supreme Court's rulings in cases like CIT vs. Sterling Foods and CIT vs. Raja Bahadur Kamakhya Narain Singh emphasize the need for a direct connection between the income and the business operations.

Analysis:
- The swapping premium is essentially discounted interest, originating from the long-term finance initially advanced.
- It is a compensation for agreeing to lower interest rates, maintaining the direct nexus with the business of providing long-term finance.
- The business of providing long-term finance is the immediate and effective source of the swapping premium.

Conclusion:
The swapping premium qualifies as profit derived from the business of providing long-term finance and is eligible for deduction under section 36(1)(viii). The ruling answers both questions in the affirmative, allowing the applicant the claimed deduction.

Final Ruling:
The Authority for Advance Rulings ruled that the applicant is eligible for the deduction under section 36(1)(viii) for the swapping premium received, answering both questions in favor of the applicant.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates