Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2016 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (7) TMI 886 - HC - Customs


Issues Involved:
1. Validity of Board's Circular No.19/2013.
2. Classification of imported goods under the appropriate tariff heading.
3. Applicability of additional customs duty.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of Board's Circular No.19/2013:
The petitioner challenged the validity of Ext.P6, Board's Circular No.19/2013, which classified "Disposable Sterilized Dialyzer" and "Microbarrier" under Chapter heading 8421 29 00. The petitioner argued that this classification was incorrect and that the Circular was illegal. The court noted that the Circular was issued to clarify the classification of filters used for blood filtration, and it concluded that the Circular was not in accordance with the statutory provisions. The court quashed the Circular, stating that it was not in terms with the statutory provisions.

2. Classification of Imported Goods:
The petitioner imported soft shell filters for blood bags and claimed exemption under Chapter heading 9018 90 99, which covers renal dialysis equipment and blood transfusion apparatus. The respondent, however, classified the goods under Chapter heading 8421 29 00 as filtering equipment for blood filtration, based on Note 2(a) of Chapter 90. The court examined the relevant tariff headings and notes, including Note 2(a) and Note 2(b) of Chapter 90. It found that the imported goods were parts of renal dialysis equipment and blood transfusion apparatus, which should be classified under Chapter heading 9018 90 31. The court emphasized that the imported components were specifically designed for use in dialysis machines and blood transfusion systems and should not be classified under the general category of filters in Chapter 8421.

3. Applicability of Additional Customs Duty:
The respondent's classification under Chapter heading 8421 29 00 resulted in an additional 12% customs duty. The petitioner contested this, arguing that if classified under Chapter 9018, the goods would be eligible for exemption or reduction in customs duty. The court agreed with the petitioner, stating that the imported goods were correctly classified under Chapter 9018 90 31, which entitled the petitioner to a reduction in customs duty. Consequently, the court set aside the proceedings initiated against the petitioner for imposing additional duty.

Conclusion:
The court allowed the writ petitions, quashed Ext.P6 Circular No.19/2013, and set aside the proceedings for imposing additional customs duty. It declared that the imported equipment should be classified under Chapter heading 9018 90 31, entitling the petitioner to a reduction in customs duty.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates