Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2016 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (9) TMI 421 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
1. Allegation of clandestine clearance and non-payment of duty against the appellant and others.
2. Confiscation of goods seized at various premises.
3. Appeal against the impugned order of Commissioner (Appeals) dated 20.06.2008.

Detailed Analysis:

1. The judgment involves an appeal against an order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the investigation conducted by the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence (DGCEI) against the appellant, a manufacturer of branded pan masala containing tobacco. The investigation included a search of various premises, leading to the seizure of gutka and other items. A show cause notice was issued demanding duty payment and imposing penalties. The original authority confirmed the demands, leading to the impugned order dated 20.06.2008. However, a separate investigation by DGCEI regarding clandestine clearance and non-payment of duty resulted in an order-in-original demanding a significant amount from various parties, including the appellant. The Tribunal set aside this order, finding the allegations unsustainable.

2. The appeal in question pertains to the demand and confiscation of goods seized at various premises on 07.10.2004. The appellant argued that since the Tribunal had already set aside the order related to clandestine removal in a separate case, the present proceedings should also be set aside. Goods valued at ?35,730 were seized from the factory premises for being in excess of recorded stock. The appellant contended that these goods were to be accounted for at the end of the day, but the authorities ordered confiscation and imposed fines. Given the Tribunal's decision on the clandestine removal allegation, the confiscation of these goods was set aside.

3. Additionally, packing material and perfumery items valued at ?10,41,892 were seized from a partner of the appellant, and gutka was seized from traders' premises. However, since the Tribunal had already set aside the proceedings related to clandestine clearance and duty demand, the seizure of these goods was deemed unsustainable. Consequently, the proceedings for imposing personal penalties on the traders were also set aside. The Tribunal decided to set aside the confiscation of seized goods and penalties based on the findings in related proceedings.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates