Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2016 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (12) TMI 574 - AT - Customs


Issues:
1. Classification of imported old and used tyres under CTH 40122020.
2. Confiscation of goods under Section 111(d) & (o) of the Customs Act, 1962.
3. Requirement of authorization from DGFT and permission from Ministry of Environment and Forest for import.
4. Imposition of redemption fine and penalty under Customs Act, 1962.
5. Applicability of Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2008.
6. Comparison with a previous Tribunal case regarding similar circumstances.

Detailed Analysis:
1. The appellant imported old and used tyres claiming classification under CTH 40122020. The Original Authority held that the tyres fell under Hazardous Wastes Rules, 2008, requiring authorization from DGFT and permission from Ministry of Environment and Forest. Confiscation was ordered under Section 111(d) & (o) of the Customs Act, 1962, with an option to redeem on payment of a fine.

2. The Order-in-Appeal upheld the confiscation, redemption fine, and re-export order. The appellant argued that the import was allowed under Exim Code 401232020 of the ITC (H.S.) classification and that the tyres were reusable, not scrap. The appellant also cited a previous Tribunal case where similar goods were allowed clearance with a redemption fine and penalty.

3. The Tribunal analyzed the case records and the cited case law. It found that absolute confiscation and re-export orders were contradictory. The Tribunal modified the orders to allow redemption of goods on a fine of 15% of the assessable value and imposed a penalty of 10% of the assessable value. The applicable duty was to be paid for release of goods within two weeks of payment.

4. The Tribunal's decision partially allowed the appeal, modifying the orders to uphold confiscation, allow redemption on a fine, impose a penalty, and require payment of applicable duty for release. The judgment clarified the application of rules and penalties in cases of imported goods, emphasizing compliance with classification and authorization requirements.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates