2009 (1) TMI 153 - HC - Income Tax

Gift-tax Whether Tribunal was right in holding that in valuing the unquoted shares for the purposes of working out the value of the deemed gift on March 20, 1979, and March 31, 1979, reference should be made to the balance-sheet of the said company as on March 31, 1978 - Revenue, has made an attempt to attack the order of the Tribunal by asserting that the Gift-tax Officer had rightly assessed the gift-tax by applying the break up method finding of tribunal is justified - in terms of the view taken by the Division Bench in Shakuntala Devi s case reference is answered in favour of the assessee

Summary

Issues:
1. Valuation of unquoted shares for gift tax purposes based on balance-sheet date.
2. Application of break-up formula for valuation of shares.
3. Interpretation of the provisions of the Gift-tax Act, 1958.
4. Consideration of balance-sheet for determining deemed gift.
5. Applicability of Explanation 1 to rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957.
6. Dispute over the break-up value of shares with reference to balance-sheet dates.
7. Comparison of different High Court decisions on similar issues.

Issue 1: Valuation of unquoted shares for gift tax purposes based on balance-sheet date.

The Commissioner of Gift-tax sought adjudication on whether the Tribunal was correct in valuing unquoted shares of a company based on the balance-sheet as of March 31, 1978, instead of March 31, 1979. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, considering the balance-sheet of March 31, 1978, as relevant for valuation. The Tribunal relied on the Kerala High Court's view that the balance-sheet available on the date of the transaction should be used for valuation. The Tribunal concluded that the Commissioner's approach was valid, rejecting the Revenue's appeal.

Issue 2: Application of break-up formula for valuation of shares.

The Gift-tax Officer applied a break-up formula to determine the value of shares sold by the assessee, which resulted in a shortfall in consideration. The shortfall was treated as a deemed gift under the provisions of the Gift-tax Act, 1958. The Commissioner modified the quantum of gift by considering the break-up value of the shares with reference to the balance-sheet as of March 31, 1979, leading to relief for the assessee. The Tribunal supported the Commissioner's decision, emphasizing that the sale of shares to family members at a lower value did not negate the element of gift involved.

Issue 3: Interpretation of the provisions of the Gift-tax Act, 1958.

The dispute revolved around the interpretation of the Gift-tax Act, 1958, particularly regarding the valuation of shares for gift tax purposes. The Commissioner and the Tribunal analyzed the provisions of the Act to determine the correct method of valuation, considering factors such as balance-sheet dates and applicability of break-up formulas. The decisions were based on a thorough understanding of the legal framework provided by the Act.

Issue 4: Consideration of balance-sheet for determining deemed gift.

The Commissioner and the Tribunal disagreed with the Revenue's contention that the balance-sheet as of March 31, 1979, should be used for determining the deemed gift. They held that the balance-sheet as of March 31, 1978, was more appropriate for valuation purposes, as per the provisions of the Gift-tax Act, 1958. This decision was supported by the Kerala High Court's interpretation of similar provisions in a related case.

Issue 5: Applicability of Explanation 1 to rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957.

The Commissioner considered Explanation 1 to rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957, in determining the break-up value of shares. By referencing the balance-sheet as of March 31, 1979, the Commissioner arrived at a different valuation compared to the Revenue's assessment. The Tribunal upheld this approach, emphasizing the relevance of the balance-sheet date in calculating the value of shares for gift tax purposes.

Issue 6: Dispute over the break-up value of shares with reference to balance-sheet dates.

The disagreement between the Revenue and the Commissioner centered on the break-up value of shares, with each party advocating for a different balance-sheet date for valuation. While the Revenue argued for the balance-sheet as of March 31, 1979, the Commissioner and the Tribunal favored the balance-sheet as of March 31, 1978. The Tribunal's decision aligned with the Kerala High Court's perspective on the importance of the balance-sheet available at the time of the transaction.

Issue 7: Comparison of different High Court decisions on similar issues.

The Tribunal referenced decisions from various High Courts, including the Madras High Court and the Kerala High Court, to support its judgment. By analyzing and comparing these decisions, the Tribunal justified its reliance on the Kerala High Court's interpretation of the relevant provisions. The Tribunal's decision was further reinforced by the Division Bench's ruling in a related case, aligning with the Kerala High Court's perspective on valuation methods for unquoted shares.

---