Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2016 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (12) TMI 989 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
1. Entitlement to Cenvat credit on welding electrodes used for repair and maintenance of plant and machinery.
2. Entitlement to Cenvat credit on steel items used in the fabrication of plant and machinery.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Entitlement to Cenvat credit on welding electrodes:
The Tribunal referred to the case of Singhal Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. vs. CC & CE, Raipur and highlighted that various decisions have allowed Cenvat credit on welding electrodes used for repair and maintenance purposes. The Tribunal also cited judgments from High Courts, such as Chhattisgarh and Rajasthan, supporting the allowance of such credit. Additionally, the Tribunal relied on the case of Dwarikesh Sugar Industries Ltd. vs. CCE, Meerut to conclude that the appellant is entitled to avail Cenvat credit on welding electrodes used in repair and maintenance activities. Therefore, the Tribunal held that the appellant correctly availed Cenvat credit on welding electrodes.

Issue 2: Entitlement to Cenvat credit on steel items:
The Tribunal examined whether the appellant is entitled to avail Cenvat credit on steel items used in the fabrication of plant and machinery. Referring to the case of Singhal Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., the Tribunal discussed the user test established by the Apex Court in the case of CCE, Jaipur vs. Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd. The user test determines whether goods can be classified as capital goods. Applying this test, the Tribunal found that the structural steel items used in the fabrication of support structures for capital goods qualify as capital goods under Rule 2(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's argument that these structures had become immovable property, emphasizing that they were integral parts of the plant and machinery used for transportation of finished goods. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the appellant is entitled to Cenvat credit on steel items used in the fabrication of plant and machinery.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the Cenvat credit on welding electrodes and steel items, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates