Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2017 (1) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (1) TMI 908 - HC - Companies Law


Issues involved:
Application for exemption under CO. APPL. 4702/2016 and application under Sections 391 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 under CO. APPL. (M) 161/2016 for proposed scheme of Amalgamation.

Analysis:
1. Application for Exemption (CO. APPL. 4702/2016):
The court granted exemption subject to all just exemptions. The application was disposed of accordingly.

2. Application under Sections 391 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (CO. APPL. (M) 161/2016):
- The application was filed jointly by Transferor Company and Transferee Company for the proposed scheme of Amalgamation.
- The Transferor Company's registered office is in New Delhi, within the court's jurisdiction, while the Transferee Company's office is in Mumbai, outside the jurisdiction. An affidavit was filed stating the Transferee Company's separate application in the Bombay High Court.
- The proposed scheme details were provided, including the history of name changes of the Transferor Company and its financial structure.
- The Board of Directors of the Transferor Company approved the proposed scheme unanimously.
- The share exchange ratio was outlined, specifying the issuance of equity shares by the Transferee Company to the shareholders of the Transferor Company.
- Consents from equity shareholders, preference shareholders, and unsecured creditors were obtained and recorded. Meetings of shareholders and creditors were dispensed with based on the consents received.
- The application sought dispensation of meetings for equity and preference shareholders, which was granted due to the consents received.
- The requirement for convening a meeting of unsecured creditors was also dispensed with as one creditor gave consent.
- Since the Transferor Company had no secured creditors, the question of convening a meeting of secured creditors did not arise.
- The application was allowed in the stated terms and disposed of accordingly.

In conclusion, the court granted exemption in CO. APPL. 4702/2016 and approved the proposed scheme of Amalgamation under CO. APPL. (M) 161/2016, dispensing with the need for meetings of shareholders and creditors based on the consents received from relevant parties.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates