Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2017 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (3) TMI 1020 - AT - Service Tax


Issues involved:
1. Valuation of taxable services under reverse charge mechanism for Service Tax.
2. Dispute regarding the treatment of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) in relation to service payments made to foreign service providers.
3. Consideration of documentary evidence for TDS refunds in the context of Service Tax liability.

Issue 1: Valuation of taxable services under reverse charge mechanism for Service Tax:
The appellant, engaged in the manufacture of fertilizers and ammonia, received Consulting Engineering services from foreign Consultancy Agencies. The appellant paid tax under reverse charge mechanism as per Section 66(A) of the Finance Act, 1994. The dispute arose when the department considered the gross value, including Tax Deducted at Source (TDS), for the purpose of service tax. The appellant contended that the Service Tax liability should be discharged only on the amounts billed by the service provider, as per Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal analyzed the relevant provisions and ruled that the Service Tax liability needs to be discharged based on the actual consideration charged by the service provider, as per Rule 7 of the Service Tax Valuation Rules, 2006. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the invoice/bill raised by the service provider to determine the correct value of taxable service provided from outside India.

Issue 2: Dispute regarding the treatment of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) in relation to service payments made to foreign service providers:
The appellant had three scenarios regarding TDS payments: TDS over and above the agreed amount, refundable TDS, and TDS deducted from the consideration value. The appellant argued that the Tribunal's decision in a previous case supported their position on the treatment of TDS. The Tribunal noted that the issue of TDS deducted from the consideration value was settled against the appellant based on a previous ruling. However, for the other two scenarios, the Tribunal referred to a different case where it was observed that the Service Tax liability should be discharged based on the actual consideration paid to the service provider. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for further examination, emphasizing the importance of documentary evidence for TDS refunds.

Issue 3: Consideration of documentary evidence for TDS refunds in the context of Service Tax liability:
The Commissioner, in the Order-in-Original, rejected the appellant's claim due to the lack of documentary evidence proving the receipt of refunded amounts from foreign service providers. The appellant maintained that all documents were available and submitted to the lower authorities but were not considered. The Tribunal, considering the availability of documents, set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for de novo examination by the adjudicating authority. The Tribunal stressed the need for a reasonable opportunity for the appellant to present evidence and directed the adjudicating authority to decide on the issue of penalty in the de novo proceedings.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, highlighting the importance of proper valuation of taxable services, the treatment of TDS in service payments to foreign providers, and the consideration of documentary evidence for TDS refunds in determining Service Tax liability under the reverse charge mechanism.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates