Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2017 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (4) TMI 27 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
- Appeal against order of Commissioner (Appeals), Indore
- Eligibility for SSI exemption based on brand name usage
- Ownership of brand name "Naughty"
- Application of Tribunal's decisions in similar cases

Analysis:
The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI was filed by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), Indore dated 12-7-2012. The case involved M/s. Naughty Foods Pvt. Ltd., engaged in the manufacture of confectionery items with the brand name "Naughty." The Revenue initiated proceedings to demand Central Excise duty and penalties after a verification by Central Excise Intelligence officers in March 2010. The original authority confirmed a duty of &8377; 12,39,758/- on M/s. Naughty Foods Pvt. Ltd. and imposed penalties. Additionally, a penalty of &8377; 1 lakh was imposed on Shri Sanjay Agrawal, the Managing Director. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the original order, leading to the Revenue's appeal.

During the hearing, the Revenue argued that M/s. Naughty Foods Pvt. Ltd. was not eligible for Small Scale Industry (SSI) exemption as they started using the brand name "Naughty" in 2008, which belonged to another person. It was highlighted that Shri Sanjay Agrawal, a Director of M/s. Naughty Foods Pvt. Ltd., owned the brand name "Naughty" and had used it previously as a proprietor. The Commissioner (Appeals) noted this ownership and usage, referencing Tribunal decisions in similar cases. The Tribunal found the Commissioner's decision to be in line with established precedents and dismissed the Revenue's appeal, as the original authority had failed to follow the relevant rulings only because appeals against those rulings were pending.

In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision, emphasizing the ownership of the brand name "Naughty" by Shri Sanjay Agrawal and the correct application of Tribunal decisions. The appeal by the Revenue was deemed to lack merit and was subsequently dismissed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates