Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2017 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (8) TMI 8 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues:
Whether the activity of converting raw milk into slim/skim milk qualifies as a manufacturing activity for exemption benefits based on the entitlement certificate issued to the respondent.

Analysis:
The main issue in this case revolves around determining whether the conversion of raw milk into slim/skim milk constitutes a manufacturing activity, thereby entitling the respondent to exemption benefits as per the entitlement certificate granted. The revenue's counsel argues that this activity does not fall under the scope of manufacturing activity, emphasizing that the entity must engage in manufacturing to qualify for tax exemption, as per section 41 of the Sales Tax Act. Both the Tribunal and the Commissioner had previously concluded that this specific activity does not amount to manufacturing. On the other hand, the respondent's counsel asserts that as long as the entitlement certificate remains valid, the respondent should be allowed exemption benefits. The counsel relies on a previous court order to support their argument.

The court carefully considered the arguments presented by both parties. It acknowledged that the respondent had indeed been issued an entitlement certificate listing various products, including milk and milk products. The court also reviewed an addendum to the entitlement certificate, which detailed modifications to the products covered. Additionally, the court referenced section 41C of the Act, which outlines the cancellation of entitlement certificates under certain circumstances. It highlighted that if an entitlement certificate is canceled, the unit loses eligibility for tax exemption.

The court emphasized that as long as the entitlement certificate remains valid and in force, the assessing officer cannot override it. The authority that issued the entitlement certificate holds the power to determine its validity, not the assessing officer. The court clarified that the assessing officer must abide by the entitlement certificate, and only the Commissioner has the authority to take action if the certificate is found to be inconsistent with relevant laws or schemes. Since the entitlement certificate in this case was valid and in operation, the court ruled in favor of the respondent, stating that they are entitled to exemption benefits for the specific activity mentioned in the certificate.

In conclusion, the court's decision hinged on the validity and operation of the entitlement certificate, emphasizing that the assessing officer cannot disregard it and that only the Commissioner has the authority to address any inconsistencies. The court's ruling favored the respondent, affirming their entitlement to exemption benefits for the activity specified in the valid entitlement certificate.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates