Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2017 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (8) TMI 803 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Exemption of sales to UNICEF under Section 8(2A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
2. Tax rate applicable to inter-State sales of store materials purchased at a concessional rate.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Exemption of Sales to UNICEF under Section 8(2A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956:

The petitioner challenged the orders disallowing the exemption of sales made to UNICEF under Section 8(2A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The petitioner relied on a notification issued by the erstwhile State of Bihar under Section 6(3)(c) of the Bihar Sales Tax Ordinance, 1976, which exempted sales to UNICEF from 'Special Sales Tax' and 'General Sales Tax' for goods certified by UNICEF for their use.

However, Section 8(2A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, stipulates that the tax payable by a dealer on turnover related to the sale of goods exempt from tax under the State Sales Tax law shall be nil or calculated at a lower rate. The explanation clarifies that a sale or purchase is not deemed generally exempt if the exemption is conditional or specified.

The court referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Commissioner of Sales Tax, J & K v. Pine Chemicals Ltd., which emphasized that exemptions must be general and not conditional. The Bihar notification exempted sales to UNICEF only if certified for their use, thus not a general exemption. Therefore, the petitioner could not avail the benefit under Section 8(2A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The authorities' view that the sales to UNICEF were not generally exempt was upheld.

2. Tax Rate Applicable to Inter-State Sales of Store Materials Purchased at a Concessional Rate:

The petitioner also contested the tax rate applied to inter-State sales of store materials worth ?28,29,774/-. The petitioner argued that these sales should be taxed at 4% under Sections 8(1) and 8(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, instead of 10%.

The court noted that the petitioner purchased store articles at a concessional rate for specific end-use. These goods were then sold to registered dealers, which contravened the conditions of concessional purchase. The goods purchased at a concessional rate under Section 8(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, or Section 13(1)(b) of the Bihar Finance Act, must be used for the specified purpose. Diverting these goods for other purposes subjects them to the normal tax rate of 10%.

The petitioner's argument regarding penalties under Sections 10A and 10(d) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, was dismissed. The court clarified that penalties and tax levies are distinct; the breach of concessional conditions results in applying the normal tax rate, not just penalties.

Conclusion:

The court found no merit in the petitioner's arguments on both issues. The orders of the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, the Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeal), and the Commercial Taxes Tribunal were upheld. The writ petition was dismissed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates