9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2009 (11) TMI 7 - AT - Service TaxCenvat credit on rent-a-cab catering service, personal accident insurance and insurance services held that credit is allowed decision in the matters of C.C.E., Mumbai V vs. GTC Industries Ltd.( 2008 -TMI - 31592 - CESTAT MUMBAI) and C.E& C., Aurangabad vs. Endurance Systems India Pvt. Ltd (2009 -TMI - 33509 - CESTAT MUMBAI) followed.
Issues:
Department's appeal against orders disallowing credit on certain services as input services for manufacturing activities. Analysis: The case involved two appeals by the Department challenging orders disallowing credit on services related to rent-a-cab catering service, personal accident insurance, and insurance services as input services for manufacturing activities. The original authority confirmed the demand, interest, and penalties, but the Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the appeals of the respondent based on previous decisions. The Department contended that the decisions in previous cases had been challenged, but it was acknowledged that the facts of the present cases were similar to those cases. The Tribunal had not stayed the orders in question. The respondents relied on a previous Tribunal decision in their favor, where similar services were treated as input services following a specific legal precedent. As the facts of the present case aligned with the cases relied upon by the Commissioner (Appeals), the Department's appeals were rejected, and the original orders were upheld. This judgment highlights the importance of consistency in applying legal precedents and the significance of factual similarities in determining the outcome of appeals. It underscores the need for parties to establish a clear connection between the facts of their case and established legal principles to support their arguments effectively. The decision also emphasizes the role of previous tribunal rulings in shaping current interpretations of the law and the requirement for parties to stay updated on the status of legal challenges to ensure the relevance of cited precedents.
|
