Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2017 (11) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (11) TMI 1512 - AT - Central Excise


Issues: Classification of product under Tariff Heading 1905.39 or 1905.31

Analysis:
The appellant, engaged in manufacturing Cadbury Milk Treat, claimed classification under subheading 1905.39, while the department classified it under subheading 1905.31, leading to a demand for differential duty. The Tribunal considered the issue of classification by referring to the Tariff Headings 1905 and 1806. It was noted that wafers coated with or containing chocolate fall under Tariff Heading 1905.3211. The Tribunal highlighted the classification of chocolate under Chapter Heading 1806, emphasizing that cocoa butter cannot be considered as cocoa. The Tribunal referred to the explanatory notes of Chapter 18 and 17.04 to determine the classification of the product. It concluded that as the Milk Treat did not contain cocoa or chocolate but only cocoa butter, it could not be classified under Tariff Heading 1905.3211. Therefore, the product was correctly classified under Tariff Heading 1905.3219, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal, after detailed analysis of the Tariff Headings and explanatory notes, classified the product Cadbury Milk Treat under Tariff Heading 1905.3219 instead of 1905.3211, as it did not contain cocoa or chocolate but only cocoa butter. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed based on this classification.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates