9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (2) TMI 1585 - AT - Income TaxAddition u/s 68 - set off of unabsorbed depreciation - Held that - Instant case the addition was cash credits u/s 68 and the income required to be taxed as income from other sources and to be included in the gross total income. Once the addition is included in the gross total income, the AO has to allow the set off of unabsorbed depreciation loss as provided u/s 71 of the IT Act. Hon ble Supreme court in CIT vs. Mother India Refrigeration Industries Private Ltd. (1985 (8) TMI 2 - SUPREME Court) held that the unabsorbed carried forward depreciation par takes the character of current year depreciation in the following year and the same is allowed to be set off against other heads of income of that year. AO has not assigned any reason for denying the claim of the assessee for set off of unabsorbed depreciation. Section 71 deals with the set off of loss from one head against income from another head. After setting up of losses against income under the same head, if the net result is still losses, the assessee can set off the such losses u/s 71 against income of the same year under any other head. Section 71 permits the assessee to set off losses other than capital gains against the income from other heads. Since the unabsorbed depreciation par takes the character of current year s depreciation in the following year, we hold that the CIT(A) has rightly allowed the set off of unabsorbed depreciation and we do not find any infirmity in the well reasoned order of the Ld. CIT(A) and the same is upheld. - Decided against revenue.
Issues Involved:
1. Set off of carried forward depreciation against the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. 2. Classification of income under various heads as per Section 14 of the Income Tax Act. 3. Applicability of Section 71 for set off of losses against income from other heads. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Set off of Carried Forward Depreciation Against Addition Made Under Section 68: The primary issue revolves around whether the assessee can set off unabsorbed carried forward depreciation against the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee declared a total income of Rs. Nil after adjusting brought forward losses. The Assessing Officer (AO) added Rs. 3,99,00,000/- as unproved cash credits under Section 68, determining a gross total income of Rs. 6,42,31,119/-. The AO allowed the set off of unabsorbed brought forward business loss and depreciation but denied the set off of unabsorbed carried forward depreciation loss from the income assessed. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] allowed the appeal, holding that once the income is treated as part of gross total income, the unabsorbed carried forward depreciation has to be allowed as set off from such total income. 2. Classification of Income Under Various Heads as Per Section 14: The CIT(A) and the Tribunal emphasized that income required to be assessed under Section 14 of the IT Act under any one of the heads of income from A to E. If the addition under Section 68 does not fit into any of these heads, it should be considered as "income from other sources" and included in the gross total income. The Tribunal referred to the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Kalekhan Mohd. Hanif Vs. CIT, which stated that the expression 'nature and source' requires identification and genuineness of the source. The Tribunal also cited the Hon'ble Madras High Court in CIT Vs. Chensing Ventures, which held that losses under any head of income could be set off against income under any other head, except for capital gains. 3. Applicability of Section 71 for Set Off of Losses Against Income from Other Heads: The Tribunal noted that Section 71 permits an assessee to set off losses other than capital gains against income from other heads. The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in CIT Vs. Shilpa Dyeing & Printing Mills (P) Ltd. supported this view. The Tribunal also referred to the Hon'ble Supreme Court in CIT vs. Mother India Refrigeration Industries Private Ltd., which held that unabsorbed carried forward depreciation partakes the character of current year depreciation in the following year, making it available for set off against other heads of income. The Tribunal concluded that the AO must allow the set off of unabsorbed depreciation once the addition is included in the gross total income. Conclusion: The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, allowing the set off of unabsorbed depreciation against the addition made under Section 68. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s well-reasoned order and dismissed the revenue's appeal. The Tribunal emphasized that unabsorbed depreciation should be treated as current year depreciation and allowed to be set off against other heads of income, following the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and various High Courts. The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)'s order.
|
