Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2018 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (4) TMI 598 - AT - Service Tax


Issues:
Service tax liability under "Commercial and Industrial Construction Service" for constructing buildings for National Rifle Association of India and ICFAI University, Dehradun.

Analysis:
The appellant was held liable for service tax under "Commercial and Industrial Construction Service" for constructing buildings for National Rifle Association of India and ICFAI University, Dehradun. The Original Authority confirmed the tax liability along with penalties, considering the buildings as commercial in nature. The appellant argued that the National Rifle Association of India is an official body for Shooting Sports in India, recognized by various sports bodies and the Ministry of Youth Welfare & Sports. They provided supporting documents to establish their non-commercial nature. Similarly, the appellant contended that ICFAI University, Delhi, is a recognized university under the UGC Act, providing educational courses, and thus, the construction for the university should not be taxed under the said service category.

Upon reviewing the case, the Tribunal found that the National Rifle Association of India is an official representative of Rifle Sports, recognized by the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports and affiliated with the Indian Olympic Association. The association's headquarter building was deemed non-commercial as it is used for recognized sports activities. Similarly, the building in the campus of ICFAI University, Dehradun, was considered non-commercial as it is used by a recognized educational institution. The Tribunal noted that the Original Authority based its decision on the fees collected by these bodies, which was deemed insufficient to classify the buildings as commercial. The Tribunal concluded that the nature of activities carried out in the buildings did not warrant them being considered commercial, leading to the setting aside of the original order and allowing the appeal of the appellant.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates