9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of provisions under the Finance Act, 1966 for the levy of additional tax on a company distributing dividends. Detailed Analysis: The judgment by the High Court of Kerala involved a reference made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the correctness of the levy of additional tax under the Finance Act, 1966 on a public limited company in liquidation. The company distributed a dividend of 5% of the paid-up capital during the relevant accounting years. The Tribunal held that the levy of additional tax under Paragraph F(1)(B) of the Finance Act, 1966 was not warranted as the distributed dividend was not in excess of 10% of the paid-up capital. The department contended that the limit of 10% applied only to dividends declared during the previous year relevant to the assessment year 1966-67. The Tribunal rejected the department's argument, stating that the levy of additional tax would only be attracted if the company had earned taxable income during the relevant period and a rebate had been allowed, which was not the case for the assessment year 1965-66. The Finance Act, 1966 introduced changes in the levy of income tax on companies, simplifying the rate schedule and eliminating the provisions for rebates. The scheme of Paragraph F of the First Schedule to the Finance Act, 1966 outlined the levy of tax at specific rates based on the total income of the company and additional tax on distributed dividends. The Court analyzed the provisions and concluded that the levy of additional tax was only warranted when a company had earned taxable income during the relevant period, which was not the case for the assessee-company. The Court emphasized that the additional tax could only be imposed on the total income that does not exceed the relevant amount of distributed dividends, and in cases of loss, it was not applicable. The Court further examined the definitions and provisions under the Finance Acts of 1964 and 1965 to determine the applicability of the additional tax on distributed dividends. It clarified that the levy of additional tax was restricted to companies that had earned taxable income during specific assessment years and distributed dividends subject to certain conditions. Based on the interpretation of relevant provisions, the Court upheld the Tribunal's decision that the assessee-company was not liable for the levy of additional tax for the year 1966-67. The judgment favored the assessee and dismissed the department's claim, with no direction regarding costs. In conclusion, the High Court's judgment provided a detailed analysis of the provisions under the Finance Act, 1966 and clarified the conditions under which the levy of additional tax on distributed dividends is applicable. The Court's interpretation emphasized the requirement of taxable income for the imposition of additional tax, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee-company in this case.
|
