Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2018 (6) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (6) TMI 518 - AAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Whether the activity undertaken by the applicant amounts to "Job Work" as defined under Section 2(68) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act, 2017).
2. What is the value on which the applicant is liable to pay GST?

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Whether the activity undertaken by the applicant amounts to "Job Work" as defined under Section 2(68) of the CGST Act, 2017.

Applicant's Arguments:
- The applicant, INOX Air Products Private Limited (INOXAP), is engaged in manufacturing industrial gases for Essar Steel India Limited (Essar) under a Job Work Agreement.
- Essar provides necessary inputs such as electricity and industrial water free of cost, and retains ownership of these inputs and the resultant gases.
- The applicant argues that their activity qualifies as job work under Section 2(68) of the CGST Act, 2017, which defines job work as "any treatment or process undertaken by a person on goods belonging to another registered person."
- The applicant cited various legal precedents and dictionary definitions to argue that the activities of separating air into gases qualify as a "process" or "treatment."
- They also argued that the inputs (electricity, water, and air) qualify as "goods" under Section 2(52) of the CGST Act, 2017.

Department's Arguments:
- The Central Excise & GST, Vadodara – I Commissionerate contended that the atmospheric air, being the main input, does not belong to Essar and therefore does not meet the definition of job work.
- They argued that the applicant's activity amounts to manufacturing and supplying new goods, not job work.

Ruling:
- The authority examined the definitions and legal precedents cited by the applicant.
- It was determined that atmospheric air, industrial water, and electricity qualify as goods under Section 2(52) of the CGST Act, 2017.
- The ownership of land extends to the ownership of the air vertically above it, hence the atmospheric air used by the applicant belongs to Essar.
- The agreement clauses and statutory provisions confirmed that the inputs provided by Essar are indeed goods belonging to Essar.
- Therefore, the activities undertaken by the applicant qualify as job work under Section 2(68) of the CGST Act, 2017.

Issue 2: What is the value on which the applicant is liable to pay GST?

Applicant's Arguments:
- The applicant argued that the value of the supply should be determined as per Section 15(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, which is the transaction value or the price actually paid or payable.
- They contended that the job work charges are the sole consideration for the supply, and therefore, GST should be payable only on these charges.

Department's Arguments:
- The department suggested that the value should include additional considerations such as the free-of-cost inputs provided by Essar.

Ruling:
- The authority noted that the applicant and Essar are not related persons under the CGST Act, 2017.
- The job work charges agreed upon in the contract are the sole consideration for the supply.
- Therefore, the value of the supply is the transaction value, i.e., the job work charges, as per Section 15(1) of the CGST Act, 2017.

Conclusion:
- The activity undertaken by the applicant falls under the definition of "Job Work" as per Section 2(68) of the CGST Act, 2017.
- The applicant is liable to pay GST on the job work charges as determined under Section 15(1) of the CGST Act, 2017.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates