Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2018 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (8) TMI 995 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues:
1. Refund of tax without interest.
2. Interpretation of provisions regarding interest on refund.

Issue 1: Refund of tax without interest
The petitioner succeeded in an appeal for exclusion of certain amounts in its taxable turnover, resulting in a refund claim. Despite this success, the respondent GST authorities did not grant any interest on the refund. The petitioner argued that the amounts paid during the interregnum period, before the appellate authority's decision, did not constitute payment of tax and hence should carry interest. The Revenue contended that interest would be due only after following the prescribed procedure of filing form ST 21, as per Section 30 of the Delhi Sales Tax Act. However, the Court found the Revenue's contention untenable, citing precedents emphasizing that pre-deposit amounts for appeals do not equate to tax payments and should be refunded with interest upon appeal success. The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, entitling them to interest from the date of the appeal's allowance.

Issue 2: Interpretation of provisions regarding interest on refund
The Court analyzed the legal provisions and precedents related to the grant of interest on refunds. It referred to judgments highlighting that pre-deposit amounts for appeals are not akin to tax payments and should be refunded with interest upon appeal success. The Court rejected the Revenue's argument that interest would accrue only after following the prescribed procedure, emphasizing that the amounts became due and payable from the date the appeal was allowed. The Court held that the petitioner was entitled to interest from the date of the appeal's allowance and directed the respondents to process and credit the amounts within four weeks. The judgment underscored that procedural steps for administrative convenience should not delay the calculation of interest on refunds, especially when the amounts were due and payable post-appeal success.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates