9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (9) TMI 1144 - AT - Service TaxLevy of service tax - renting of immovable properties such as commercial complex, shops, lands etc. to various parties - Held that - The Hon ble Supreme Court has found it proper to defer decisions in these matters awaiting the judgment of the nine Judge Bench in Mineral Area Development Authority and Others 2011 (3) TMI 1554 - SUPREME COURT - in the interests of justice, all these appeals should be kept in abeyance pending the decision of the Hon ble Supreme Court in all the three cases referred to supra, namely UTV News Ltd. 2018 (5) TMI 1367 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , Home Solutions Retails India Ltd. 2011 (10) TMI 13 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA and Ritika Pvt. Ltd. 2011 (12) TMI 706 - SUPREME COURT , since the final outcome therein will have a translational impact and affect the decision in all such matters as covered in these appeals.
Issues:
Taxability on amounts received for renting immovable properties under the head Renting of Immovable Property as per Section 65(105)(zzzz) of the Finance Act, 1994; Constitutional validity of levy of service tax under section 65(105)(zzzz) of the Finance Act. Analysis: The dispute in the appeals revolves around the taxability of amounts received for renting immovable properties such as commercial complexes, shops, lands, etc. The lower authorities confirmed the demands of service tax with interest under the Renting of Immovable Property as defined in Section 65(105)(zzzz) of the Finance Act, 1994, and imposed penalties. Both parties presented arguments based on various judgments, including those of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, regarding the legislative competence of the Union Parliament to levy service tax on renting of immovable property. The appellants' counsel referred to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in a related case and highlighted that the issue of legislative competence was pending before a nine-Judge Bench. They requested deferral of decisions in the appeals pending the final decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. On the other hand, the respondent's representatives argued that the judgments of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi had not been stayed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, indicating no stay on future liability towards service tax from a certain date. The Tribunal considered the arguments presented by both sides and noted that the judgments of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi had been followed in recent decisions without any stay on their operation. However, the Tribunal acknowledged a recent order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court addressing the legislative competence of Parliament regarding service tax on renting of immovable property. The Hon'ble Supreme Court had deferred decisions in similar matters pending a judgment by a nine-Judge Bench, indicating the importance of awaiting the final outcome before proceeding with these appeals. In light of the developments and the importance of the pending judgment by the nine-Judge Bench, the Tribunal decided to defer the decisions in the appeals until the final decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in related cases. The appeals were closed for statistical purposes, with the provision for parties to file applications to reopen the matters based on the outcome of the pending judgment or any change in circumstances. The Tribunal emphasized the need to await the final decision that could impact all similar matters covered in the appeals.
|
