Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Wealth-tax Wealth-tax + HC Wealth-tax - 1978 (12) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1978 (12) TMI 26 - HC - Wealth-tax

Issues:
Valuation of shares for wealth tax assessment in the estate of late Sir E. C. Benthal for the assessment years 1957-58 and 1958-59.

Analysis:
The case involved the wealth tax assessment of the estate of late Sir E. C. Benthal for the assessment years 1957-58 and 1958-59. The assets in question were ordinary and deferred shares of two companies. The valuation dates were the 31st March of the calendar years 1957 and 1958. The valuation of the ordinary and deferred shares was a key issue in this case.

The Wealth Tax Officer (WTO) estimated the market value of the shares for both assessment years. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) upheld these valuations on appeal. However, the assessee contended, before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, that the break-up value of the shares should consider deduction of proposed dividends on cumulative preference shares. The Tribunal agreed that proposed dividends on cumulative preference shares should be deducted as they are a first charge on profits, affecting the value of ordinary and deferred shares.

The Tribunal referred a question of law to the High Court regarding the deduction of proposed dividends on cumulative preference shares in determining the market value of the shares. The High Court noted a Supreme Court judgment that shares should be valued based on certain principles, including market value for quoted shares and profit-earning capacity for unquoted shares. The court directed the Tribunal to apply these principles to determine the value of the shares in question.

The High Court concluded by directing the Tribunal to apply the principles laid down by the Supreme Court for valuation. The reference was disposed of with no order as to costs. Justice BIMAL CHANDRA BASAK concurred with the judgment.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates