1978 (6) TMI 34 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
The judgment involves the question of whether a certain amount representing the difference between dividends declared in the United Kingdom and assessed by the UK income-tax authorities, and the amount included in the Indian income-tax assessment, should be considered as income of the assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Details:
The assessee, an individual with income from salary in India, also received dividends from a UK company. The UK authorities assessed the dividends at a certain amount, and the Indian income-tax assessment included a sum representing the difference between the UK assessment and the Indian assessment as foreign income. The issue revolved around whether this difference should be treated as income of the assessee under the Indian Income Tax Act.

The Appellate Tribunal initially held that the amount in question was not the income of the assessee under the Indian Income Tax Act. The Tribunal considered the provisions of the UK and Indian tax laws, as well as previous decisions, in reaching this conclusion. The Tribunal found that the deduction of tax from the dividend income of the foreign company did not constitute income accruing or arising to the assessee under section 5(1) of the Act.

The assessee contended that the provisions of sections 198 and 5(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, were not properly considered in the previous decisions. Counsel for the assessee argued that the deduction of tax from dividends received from a foreign company should not be treated as income accruing or arising to the assessee under section 5(1)(c) without a specific deeming provision similar to section 198 for Indian company dividends.

In light of the arguments presented, the High Court found in favor of the assessee, holding that the amount in question should not be considered as income of the assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized the absence of a specific deeming provision for dividends received from foreign companies in section 198, and the requirement for income to actually accrue or arise to the assessee under section 5(1)(c) for taxation purposes. The Court's decision was based on a thorough analysis of the relevant provisions and previous judicial interpretations.

This judgment highlights the importance of considering specific provisions of the Income Tax Act and the principles of taxation when determining the taxability of certain income sources, especially in cases involving foreign dividends and cross-border taxation issues.