Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2019 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (5) TMI 1156 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
Confirmation of disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 8D.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the disallowance of ?18,78,416 under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case involved a search and seizure action under section 132 of the Act, leading to the issuance of a notice under section 153C for assessment years 2005-06 to 2010-11. The Assessing Officer disallowed ?23,08,347 under section 14A, out of which ?18,78,416 was added back to the assessee's income after allowing a deduction of ?4,29,931 self-disallowed by the assessee. The assessee challenged the invocation of section 153C and the disallowance under section 14A before the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) but was unsuccessful.

The assessee raised multiple grounds of appeal before the Tribunal, questioning the legality of the order passed by the Ld. CIT (A) and the disallowance made under section 14A. The Authorized Representative argued that the disallowance did not relate to any material found during the search and relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Pr. C.I.T. vs. Kabul Chawla. The AR contended that without incriminating material, no addition under section 153A/153C could be made. The CIT DR, on the other hand, argued in favor of upholding the disallowance, emphasizing the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction under section 153C.

The Tribunal analyzed the legal position as summarized in the judgment of Kabul Chawla by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, emphasizing the necessity of incriminating material for making additions in assessment years not abated. The Tribunal held that since no incriminating material was found during the search related to the disallowance under section 14A, the AO lacked jurisdiction to make such an addition. Citing the importance of seized material, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition made in the assessment year under consideration. As the issue was decided in favor of the assessee on legal grounds, the other raised grounds were not adjudicated upon.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, emphasizing the requirement of incriminating material for jurisdiction under section 153C and directing the deletion of the disallowance under section 14A due to the absence of such material.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates