Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2019 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (7) TMI 1384 - HC - GST


Issues:
1. Confiscation of goods and conveyances under Section 130 of the GST Act
2. Detention and seizure of goods with vehicle No. GJ-01-AT-1961
3. Release of goods during the pendency of the petition
4. Interpretation of Sections 129 and 130 of the GST Act

Analysis:
The writ applicant, a proprietary concern engaged in trading sonography machines, filed a writ application seeking various reliefs, including quashing a notice for confiscation of goods and conveyances under Section 130 of the GST Act. The applicant had sold a sonography machine to Dr. Devchandbhai Prajapati, which was intercepted by authorities during transit due to a missing e-way bill. The machine and the vehicle were seized, and confiscation proceedings were initiated. The applicant had deposited a sum towards tax and penalty. The court noted the pending proceedings under Sections 129 and 130 of the GST Act and scheduled a final hearing for a later date.

The court acknowledged the importance of the issue involving Sections 129 and 130 of the GST Act and decided to release the sonography machine, considering it had been with the authorities for over a month. The court directed the respondent authorities to release the machine promptly since the applicant had already paid a significant amount towards tax and penalty. The court emphasized the need for the release of the machine pending the final resolution of the petition.

In conclusion, the court ordered the release of the sonography machine based on the applicant's compliance with the tax and penalty requirements. The court's decision to release the goods before the final hearing demonstrated a balance between the interests of the parties involved and the need for timely resolution of the matter. The judgment highlighted the court's authority to grant interim relief and ensure fairness in proceedings related to confiscation and detention under the GST Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates