Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2019 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (8) TMI 1048 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Addition of bonus payable under section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Disallowance of closing allowance made by the Assessing Officer.

Issue 1: Addition of Bonus Payable under Section 43B:
The Revenue challenged the relief allowed by the Ld. CIT(A) regarding the addition of ?1,15,00,000 made by the Assessing Officer under section 43B of the Act for bonus payable to employees. The Assessing Officer disallowed the sum for non-payment of bonus before the due date of filing the return of income. The Ld. CIT(A) deleted the addition after the assessee provided detailed bank statements showing transfer of bonus amounts to employees' bank accounts. The Ld. DR argued that relevant details were not produced earlier, while the assessee's counsel presented evidence supporting the payment. The Tribunal found that the bonus payable was transferred to employees' bank accounts before the due date of filing the return of income, meeting the requirements of section 43B. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal on this ground.

Issue 2: Disallowance of Closing Allowance:
The Revenue contested the relief allowed by the Ld. CIT(A) on the disallowance of closing allowance of ?89,69,363 made by the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer deemed this amount as an unascertained liability created by the order of Directors of the working committee. The Ld. CIT(A) found that the amount had been paid to employees before the income tax return filing, and thus, he deleted the addition. The Ld. DR relied on the Assessing Officer's order, while the assessee's counsel argued that the closing allowance was quantifiable and a regular payment. The Tribunal observed that the provision for closing allowance was quantifiable, incurred for business purposes, and therefore allowable under section 37(1) of the Act. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal on this ground as well.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the Ld. CIT(A)'s decisions regarding both the addition of bonus payable under section 43B and the disallowance of closing allowance. The Tribunal found that the assessee had complied with the legal requirements and that the closing allowance was a quantifiable liability incurred for business purposes, thus dismissing the Revenue's grounds of appeal.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates