9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (9) TMI 1125 - AT - Income TaxTCS u/s 206C - Failure to to collect TCS at the time of sale of 'scrap' of arising on dismantling of ships on certain items - Tax imposed u/s 206C(1) r.w.s. 206C(6), 206C(6A) and interest thereon u/s 206C(7) - HELD THAT - There is no violation of the provisions of section 206C of the Act in view of either the sale of specified products being that of non-excisable, non-scrap products (to the extent of ₹ 16,98,13,542/-), or the same being against receipt of declarations in prescribed form number 27C (to the extent of ₹ 9,39,36,107/-). As already been held, while dealing with the first ground of appeal, that the non-excisable products are obtained from the ships and sold as it is without undergoing any manufacturing process thereon and the same therefore cannot partake the character of scrap within the meaning of section 206C. The appellant therefore cannot be burdened with the liability of TCS in connection with sale of such products. Insofar as the sale towards various non-excisable products was concerned, the appellant could not have been treated as assessee in default. However, the AO has written in his remand report that out of amount of ₹ 16,98,13,542/- which includes non-excisable, old and used plates etc, the items on which no relief is available as per judgment discussed above are clearly liable for TCS. But the AO has not given any working whether this amount includes such items on which relief is not available. At the time of assessment also the AO has not pointed out any discrepancy in the chart of sale provided by the assessee which shows a sale of ₹ 16,98,13,542/- in part 'B' which contains used plates, machinery and machinery part, fuel and oil, fire wood and wooden items and articles of iron steel anchor. These are the items obtained by the assessee in the course of ship breaking activity and these are 'usable as such' on which as per court decision in the case of Priya Blue 2015 (11) TMI 1216 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT no TCS is to be collected, and therefore, do not fall within the definition of 'scrap'. Hence, the items shown in Part 'B' of the chart given by the assessee to the AO at the time of assessment amounting to ₹ 16,98,13,542/- are not under the purview of the provision of TCS. The AO is directed to treat the appellant not liable to collect TCS on the sales. Sale of certain items arising from ship breaking activity grouped by assessee - It is the case on behalf of the assessee that non-residuary items are outside the purview of Explanation (b) to Section 206C of the Act where the 'waste and scrap' arising from ship breaking is usable as such without modification. Sale of such items capable of being used as such is outside the ambit of Section 206C of the Act. We find merit in the plea raised on behalf of the assessee in the light of decision of Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Priya Blue Industries (P.) Ltd. (supra). Thus, on first principles, the items sold which are capable of being used as such are discharged from the obligations fastened under s. 206C of the Act. CIT(A) in our view has looked into the controversy objectively after taking cognizance of remand report and replies of the assessee and in the light of evidence placed before it. - Decided against revenue
Issues Involved:
1. Applicability of Section 206C of the Income-tax Act on the sale of items arising from ship breaking activity. 2. Obligation to collect Tax Collected at Source (TCS) on items sold as 'scrap'. 3. Validity of declarations in Form 27C for non-collection of TCS. 4. Treatment of items that are usable as such without modification as 'scrap'. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Applicability of Section 206C of the Income-tax Act on the sale of items arising from ship breaking activity: The Revenue challenged the CIT(A)'s decision reversing the tax imposed under Section 206C(1) r.w.s. 206C(6), 206C(6A) of the Act, amounting to ?27,60,838/- and interest amounting to ?23,19,104/- imposed under Section 206C(7). The Revenue argued that the entire ship purchases for scrapping/breaking/recycling constitute 'scrap' under Section 206C, and the assessee failed to collect TCS on certain sales of items arising from ship breaking. 2. Obligation to collect TCS on items sold as 'scrap': The assessee contended that the items listed in 'Part-B' of the tabulated statement were not liable for TCS collection as they were usable as such without modification. These items included plates, machinery and machinery parts, fuels and oils, firewood and wooden items, articles of iron & steel anchor, and miscellaneous items. The assessee argued these items did not fall within the definition of 'scrap' as per Explanation (b) to Section 206C of the Act, which defines 'scrap' as 'waste and scrap' not usable as such. 3. Validity of declarations in Form 27C for non-collection of TCS: The CIT(A) noted that the buyers of such goods furnished declarations under Section 206C(1A) that the goods would be used for manufacturing/processing/producing articles or things and not for trading. The CIT(A) referenced judicial pronouncements, including the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in CIT v. Valibhai Khanbhai Mankad and the ITAT Bangalore Bench in Karnataka Forest Development Corpn. Ltd. v. ITO, which supported the view that if declarations in Form 27C were received, the assessee was under no obligation to collect TCS. 4. Treatment of items that are usable as such without modification as 'scrap': The CIT(A) concluded that the items listed in 'Part-B', amounting to ?16,98,13,542/-, were not under the purview of TCS provisions as they were usable as such and did not constitute 'scrap'. The CIT(A) directed the AO to treat the assessee as not liable to collect TCS on these sales. The Tribunal upheld this view, noting that the CIT(A) had objectively considered the evidence, remand report, and replies of the assessee. The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's plea, supported by the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court's decision in Priya Blue Industries (P.) Ltd., that items usable as such are outside the ambit of Section 206C. Conclusion: The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the CIT(A)'s decision that the items in 'Part-B' were not liable for TCS collection under Section 206C, as they were usable without modification and supported by valid declarations in Form 27C. The Tribunal found no fault in the CIT(A)'s action, which was in tune with the law and supported by judicial precedents.
|
