Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2019 (10) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (10) TMI 944 - AAR - GST


Issues:
1. Whether GST is applicable for providing services to a government organization and at what rate?
2. Whether the service provided to government organizations is exempt under specific notifications?
3. Whether the activity is related to functions entrusted to a municipality and if any GST exemption applies?
4. Determining if the recipient of services is a Governmental Authority or Government Entity for GST exemption.

Analysis:

Issue 1: The applicant sought clarification on charging GST for providing services to a government organization. The nature of the work involved only labor and services without any goods, constituting a composite supply as per CGST Act. The service provided involved the transportation of waste, and the applicant received payment based on the number of loads transported.

Issue 2: The applicant inquired about exemptions under specific notifications for services provided to government organizations. The ruling authority analyzed the conditions under Entry No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017, which exempts pure services provided to certain entities as specified. The ruling authority concluded that the services provided to KRIDL, a government entity, are covered under this exemption.

Issue 3: The applicant questioned if the activity is related to functions entrusted to a municipality and if any GST exemption applies. The ruling authority examined the functions listed under Article 243W of the Constitution, determining that the activity related to solid waste management falls under the functions of a municipality, satisfying the conditions for exemption.

Issue 4: The ruling authority evaluated whether the recipient of services, KRIDL, qualifies as a Governmental Authority or Government Entity for GST exemption. KRIDL, being a government undertaking with full control by the State Government, was classified as a Government Entity, meeting the criteria for exemption under the relevant notification.

The ruling authority consolidated the applicant's questions into one, addressing the tax rate and exemption eligibility comprehensively. By analyzing the specific notifications and legal definitions, the ruling concluded that the services provided by the applicant to KRIDL are exempt from GST as per Entry No. 3 of the relevant notification. The ruling clarified the applicability of GST exemptions based on the nature of services, recipient classification, and functions related to government entities and municipalities.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates