Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2019 (11) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (11) TMI 828 - AT - Service Tax


Issues:
- Applicability of Cenvat credit on tax liability paid under VCES Scheme
- Denial of credit for services received from foreign associates

Analysis:

Issue 1: Applicability of Cenvat credit on tax liability paid under VCES Scheme
The appellant, engaged in manufacturing excisable goods, received various services from a foreign associated company, taxable under Management Consultancy Services. Despite the tax liability falling on the appellant due to the absence of the foreign company's office in India, the appellant did not discharge the tax liability during the relevant period. Subsequently, under the VCES Scheme, the appellant filed a declaration for the tax liability, which was accepted, and discharge certificates were issued. The appellant then claimed credit for the duty paid under the VCES Scheme. However, a show cause notice was issued denying the credit, leading to the Commissioner of Central Excise denying the credit, confirming the denial under Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rule, 2004, demanding interest, and imposing a penalty of ?10 lakhs under Rule 50(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

Analysis of Issue 1:
The appellant argued that all services received from foreign associates were utilized in their factory for manufacturing final products, making them eligible for Cenvat credit as input services. The Revenue contended that since the payment was made under the VCES Scheme, the appellant was not entitled to credit. The Circular No.170/5/2013-ST clarified that tax amounts deposited under the VCES Scheme are available as Cenvat credit to the assessee. However, the Circular also specified conditions under which Cenvat credit cannot be utilized for payment of tax dues under the scheme. The Tribunal analyzed Rule 9(1)(a) and 9(1)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, emphasizing that the duty was not paid at the time of importing services, indicating suppression of facts. The payment under the VCES Scheme was considered as payment through supplementary invoices due to misstatement or suppression with intent to evade duty payment. Consequently, the Cenvat credit of service tax paid was deemed unavailable to the appellant under Rule 9(1)(b).

Issue 2: Denial of credit for services received from foreign associates
The appellant's claim for credit on services received from foreign associates was denied by the Commissioner of Central Excise, citing lack of nexus with manufacturing activity. The Commissioner confirmed the denial and imposed interest and penalty.

Analysis of Issue 2:
The Tribunal upheld the denial of credit based on the conclusion that the appellant was not entitled to credit in principle due to the payment under the VCES Scheme being considered as payment through supplementary invoices, indicating suppression of facts. The lack of nexus with manufacturing activity was deemed irrelevant when the appellant was not entitled to credit. The Tribunal confirmed the demand against the appellant along with interest.

In conclusion, the Tribunal confirmed the denial of Cenvat credit for the tax liability paid under the VCES Scheme and for services received from foreign associates, emphasizing the suppression of facts and the ineligibility of the appellant for credit. The penalty imposed was set aside due to the issue being a bona fide interpretation of the law.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates