Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAAR GST - 2020 (1) TMI AAAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (1) TMI 795 - AAAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Delay in pronouncement of the ruling by the Advance Ruling Authority.
2. Classification and applicable tax rate for Pharmaceutical Reference Standards (PRS) under GST.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Delay in Pronouncement of the Ruling:
The Appellant argued that the Advance Ruling Authority violated Section 98(6) of the CGST Act by not pronouncing the ruling within 90 days from the date of receipt of the application. The ruling was pronounced almost 12 months after the application was filed. The Appellant cited several decisions to support the claim of a gross violation of statutory provisions.

2. Classification and Applicable Tax Rate for PRS:
The core issue was the classification and applicable tax rate for PRS imported and supplied by the Appellant.

a. Classification under Customs Tariff Act:
The Appellant classified PRS as "Prepared Laboratory Reagents" under Tariff Entry 3822 00 90 of the Customs Tariff Act. This classification was supported by a previous decision of the CESTAT, Bangalore, and upheld by the Supreme Court of India.

b. Applicable GST Rate:
The Appellant sought clarity on whether PRS, classified under Tariff Item 3822 00 90, falls under Entry No. 80 of Schedule-II to Notification No. 1/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017, attracting a 12% tax rate.

c. Advance Ruling Authority's Decision:
The Karnataka Authority for Advance Rulings held that PRS, not used for diagnostic purposes, did not fall under Entry No. 80 of Schedule II but under the residuary Entry No. 453 of Schedule III, attracting an 18% tax rate. The Authority applied the principle of ejusdem generis, interpreting that only diagnostic reagents were covered under Entry No. 80.

d. Appellant's Arguments:
The Appellant argued that the term "reagent" in Entry No. 80 should encompass both diagnostic and laboratory reagents. They contended that the HSN Explanatory Notes for Heading 3822 include both diagnostic and other analytical reagents. The Appellant emphasized that the term "reagent" is generic and should cover all reagents under Heading 3822. They also pointed out that the GST Council recommended a 12% rate for "Diagnostic or Laboratory Reagents," indicating legislative intent to include all reagents under this rate.

e. Appellate Authority's Findings:
The Appellate Authority agreed with the Appellant's interpretation. It noted that Chapter Heading 3822 of the Customs Tariff includes both diagnostic and laboratory reagents. The correct interpretation of Entry No. 80 of Schedule II is "all diagnostic kits and all reagents," encompassing all reagents under Heading 3822. The principle of ejusdem generis was found inapplicable since the term "all" precedes the enumeration, not following it. The legislative intent, as indicated by the Fitment Committee's recommendation, was to reduce the GST rate on all reagents to 12%.

Conclusion:
The Appellate Authority concluded that PRS (Prepared Laboratory Reagents) imported and supplied by the Appellant, classified under Tariff Item 3822 00 90, is covered under Entry No. 80 of Schedule-II to Notification No. 1/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017, attracting a 12% tax rate. The Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 71/2019 was set aside, and the appeal filed by the Appellant was allowed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates