9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2020 (4) TMI 170 - HC - GSTRejection of refund claim - explanation to Rule 93 of the CGST Rules and MGST Rules - HELD THAT - The respondents have not appeared despite intimation. We are adjourning this petition by a period of two weeks from today and would take up the petition for consideration on the next date. At that time, we expect the Revenue to be represented, failing which we would consider the petition on its own merits and on the basis of the submissions made in support thereof. Stand over to 29th August, 2019.
The High Court of Bombay issued an order in a case where the respondents did not appear despite intimation. The petition challenges the rejection of a refund claim based on certain rules. The court adjourned the case for two weeks, expecting the Revenue to be represented at the next hearing on 29th August, 2019.
|
