Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2020 (7) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (7) TMI 408 - AAR - GST


Issues involved:
1. Classification of Tamarind Seed under HSN Code 1209 for tax purposes.

Analysis:
The applicant sought an advance ruling on whether Tamarind Seed attracts a Nil Rate of Tax under HSN Code 1209, specifically categorized as "Forest Trees Seed." The applicant argued that the HSN classification and the definition of forest produce under the Indian Forest Act support the interpretation that Tamarind Seed should be considered as seeds of a kind used for sowing, thus attracting a Nil rate of tax. They referenced notifications and rules to establish that Tamarind is declared as a forest produce, emphasizing its classification as a forest tree under relevant regulations.

During the personal hearing, the applicant reiterated their stance, relying on the HSN classification, Supreme Court precedents, and governmental declarations to support their claim. However, the Authority noted that the applicant admitted to selling Tamarind Seed for commercial/industrial purposes without providing documentation certifying it for sowing. The Authority referenced CBIC FAQs clarifying the classification of Tamarind Kernel under HSN Code 1207, which attracts a 5% tax rate, contrary to the applicant's claim under HSN Code 1209.

In the final ruling, the Authority determined that Tamarind Seed falls under Schedule-I, Sl. No. 70 of Chapter 1207 as per Notification No. 1/2017 - Central Tax (Rate), attracting a tax rate of 5% (2.5% CGST + 2.5% SGST). Despite the applicant's arguments based on HSN classification and forest produce definitions, the Authority upheld the classification under Chapter 1207, aligning with CBIC clarifications and tax notifications. The ruling emphasized the specific tax treatment based on the classification provided under the applicable notifications and regulations, leading to the conclusion of the case.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates