9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2020 (8) TMI 721 - AT - Income TaxExemption u/s 11 - charitable activity u/s 2(15) - A.O. observed that all the activities of the assessee were in the nature of trade, commerce and business - many members had given amounts more than ₹ 50,000/- and they would become beneficiaries as per Section 13(3)(b), exemption also stands withdrawn by applying provisions of Sections 13(1) and 13(2) - HELD THAT - As decided in own case 2020 (7) TMI 543 - ITAT DELHI no infirmity in the order of the CIT(A) in holding that the activities of the assessee are charitable in nature and the assessee is entitled to the claim of exemption u/s 11 of the IT Act. - Decided in favour of assessee.
Issues Involved:
1. Eligibility for exemption under Section 11 of the I.T. Act, 1961. 2. Nature of activities as charitable or commercial. 3. Deletion of additions and allowance of exemption under Section 11. 4. Applicability of the principle of mutuality. 5. Reference to provisions of Sections 13(1) and 13(2) of the I.T. Act. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Eligibility for exemption under Section 11 of the I.T. Act, 1961: The primary issue was whether the assessee, a society registered under Section 12A, was eligible for exemption under Section 11. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) denied the exemption, arguing that the assessee's activities were commercial in nature, thus falling under the proviso to Section 2(15). The Ld. CIT(A) allowed the exemption, citing consistent favorable judgments from earlier years and the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, which held that the assessee's activities were charitable. The Tribunal upheld this decision, referencing multiple precedents where similar exemptions were granted to the assessee. 2. Nature of activities as charitable or commercial: The A.O. contended that the assessee's activities, including organizing seminars and charging fees for services, were commercial. However, the Ld. CIT(A) and the Tribunal found that these activities were incidental to the assessee's charitable purpose of promoting industrial and mercantile interests. The Tribunal noted that the Hon'ble Delhi High Court had previously ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the charitable nature of its activities despite the commercial elements. 3. Deletion of additions and allowance of exemption under Section 11: The A.O. had added ?5,21,54,651/- to the assessee's income, denying the Section 11 exemption. The Ld. CIT(A) deleted this addition, directing the A.O. to allow the exemption with all consequential benefits. The Tribunal supported this decision, emphasizing the consistency of judicial precedents that favored the assessee's claim for exemption. 4. Applicability of the principle of mutuality: The A.O. argued that the principle of mutuality did not apply because some members contributed more than ?50,000/-, making them beneficiaries under Section 13(3)(b). The Ld. CIT(A) rejected this, stating that the assessee worked for the broader interest of trade and commerce, not just its members. The Tribunal agreed, noting no evidence was provided to show specific benefits transferred to members. 5. Reference to provisions of Sections 13(1) and 13(2) of the I.T. Act: The A.O. invoked Sections 13(1) and 13(2), arguing that the assessee's activities benefited members who contributed more than ?50,000/-. The Ld. CIT(A) dismissed this claim, finding no merit in the A.O.'s conclusion. The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision, reiterating that the assessee's activities were charitable and not in violation of the cited provisions. Conclusion: The Tribunal dismissed the Department's appeal, affirming the Ld. CIT(A)'s order that the assessee's activities were charitable and eligible for exemption under Section 11. The Tribunal's decision relied heavily on consistent judicial precedents, including multiple rulings from the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, which had previously adjudicated in favor of the assessee on similar grounds.
|
