Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + Commissioner GST - 2020 (10) TMI Commissioner This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (10) TMI 948 - Commissioner - GST


Issues:
Cancellation of GST registration due to non-filing of returns, rejection of application for revocation of cancellation, principles of natural justice violation.

Analysis:
The appellant's GST registration was canceled due to non-filing of GSTR 3B returns, with the application for revocation rejected for failure to respond to a show cause notice within the specified time. The appellant contended that all pending returns had been filed, citing financial hardship and lack of awareness about online filing procedures. The Additional Commissioner noted the rejection was based solely on the failure to file a reply on the GST portal, which was deemed against the principles of natural justice.

Rule 23 of the CGST Rules, 2017 addresses the revocation of cancellation of registration. It stipulates that no application for revocation can be filed if registration was canceled due to failure to furnish returns unless the returns are filed and any tax amount due is paid along with interest, penalty, and late fees. The rule also mandates filing all returns from the date of cancellation till the date of revocation within thirty days of the revocation order.

The Additional Commissioner referred to a circular from the Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs clarifying the procedure for revocation of cancellation of registration. The circular emphasized that all due returns must be filed before applying for revocation, and any returns from the cancellation date to the revocation date must be submitted within thirty days of the revocation order. Consequently, the appellant was directed to adhere to the procedure outlined in Rule 23 of the CGST Rules, 2017 and the circular for further action by the adjudicating authority.

In conclusion, the appeal was disposed of in accordance with the legal provisions and clarifications provided, emphasizing the necessity for the appellant to follow the prescribed procedures for revocation of the GST registration cancellation.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates