Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2020 (12) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (12) TMI 492 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues involved:
1. Application under Section 33(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for liquidation of Sungil India Private Limited.
2. Determination of financial creditor status of CoC members.
3. Exclusion of days lost in legal proceedings from the CIRP timeline.
4. Decision on liquidation of the corporate debtor based on valuation reports.

Detailed Analysis:
1. The Resolution Professional filed an application for liquidation of Sungil India Private Limited under Section 33(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The process began with the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional and subsequent CoC meetings to appoint a Resolution Professional. The Adjudicating Authority considered the background of the case, including challenges to the financial creditor status of certain CoC members, leading to the decision to declare them as unsecured creditors rather than financial creditors eligible for the CIRP process.

2. The Adjudicating Authority's analysis focused on whether the advances made by certain CoC members constituted financial debt or unsecured loans. It was observed that the absence of formal loan agreements did not preclude the advances from being categorized as loans, especially considering the interest payments made by the Corporate Debtor. The Authority also highlighted the exorbitant interest rates charged by these members, leading to a determination of extortionate credit transactions, thereby impacting their financial creditor status.

3. Regarding the exclusion of days lost in legal proceedings from the CIRP timeline, the Resolution Professional sought an extension due to legal delays. While the Adjudicating Authority did not grant exclusion, it provided a 90-day extension to complete the CIRP. However, given the non-operational status of the Corporate Debtor and the absence of viable resolution options, the decision was made to proceed with liquidation under Section 33(2) of the IBC in the stakeholders' interest.

4. Valuation reports determining the fair value and liquidation value of the Corporate Debtor were submitted to the Adjudicating Authority. The average values were assessed, leading to the Tribunal's decision to order the liquidation of the corporate debtor. The Liquidator was appointed, and various directions were issued regarding public announcements, communication with regulatory authorities, cessation of moratorium, discharge of employees, and the initiation of the liquidation process in compliance with relevant regulations.

In conclusion, the Tribunal's detailed judgment addressed the issues of financial creditor status, legal proceedings' impact on CIRP timelines, and the decision to liquidate Sungil India Private Limited based on valuation reports and regulatory compliance.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates