Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + AT Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2020 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (12) TMI 954 - AT - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues involved:
1. Appeal against Impugned Order dated 09.12.2020 passed by the Adjudicating Authority.
2. Rejection of Resolution Plan by the Committee of Creditors (COC) leading to liquidation application.
3. Filing of revised offer by the Resolution Applicant and seeking reconsideration by COC.
4. Premature application under Section 33 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
5. Consideration of revised Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating Authority.
6. Role of Resolution Professional in processing the revised Plan.
7. Decision-making authority of the Committee of Creditors regarding the Resolution Plan.

Analysis:
1. The Appellant filed an appeal against the Impugned Order dated 09.12.2020, which was a short order passed by the Adjudicating Authority. The order highlighted that the Resolution Applicant's initial plan was rejected by the COC, leading to a resolution for liquidation of the company. The Resolution Applicant then filed a revised offer, seeking direction for reconsideration by the COC. However, the Adjudicating Authority found the application premature as the COC had already passed a resolution and the RP had filed an application under Section 33 of the IB Code.

2. The Learned Counsel for the Appellant argued that the revised Resolution Plan was submitted to save the Corporate Debtor from liquidation after the initial plan was rejected. The Counsel emphasized that the 270-day period had not expired, and the matter was still pending before the Adjudicating Authority. The revised Plan was presented for consideration by the COC to prevent liquidation.

3. Upon hearing both parties, the Adjudicating Authority set aside the Impugned Order and directed the Resolution Professional to process the revised Resolution Plan for submission to the COC. It was stated that the COC would have the authority to accept or reject the Plan, leading to further decisions regarding liquidation if necessary. The appeal was disposed of with these directions.

4. The decision highlighted the importance of allowing the COC to consider the revised Resolution Plan before making any decisions regarding liquidation. The Resolution Professional was instructed to follow the provisions of the IBC in processing the Plan, emphasizing the COC's role in the final decision-making process.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates