Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + SC Income Tax - 2000 (12) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2000 (12) TMI 99 - SC - Income TaxWhether the application in Form No. 10 under rule 17 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, could be filed even after the assessment is completed ? Whether the Income-tax Rules could not fix any time limit for submitting an application in Form No. 10 under rule 17 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 ? Held that - It is abundantly clear from the wording of sub-section (2) of section 11 that it is mandatory for the person claiming the benefit of section 11 to intimate to the assessing authority the particulars required, under rule 17 in Form No. 10 of the Rules. If during the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer does not have the necessary information. question of excluding such income from assessment does not arise at all. As a matter of fact, this benefit of excluding this particular part of the income from the net of taxation arises from section 11 and is subjected to the conditions specified therein. Therefore, it is necessary that the assessing authority must have this information at the time he completes the assessment. In the case in hand it is evident from the records of the case that the respondent did not furnish the required information till after the assessments for the relevant years were completed. In the light of the above, we are of the opinion that the stand of the Revenue that the High Court erred in answering the first question in favour of the assessee is correct, and we reverse that finding and answer the said question in the negative and against the assessee. In view of our answer to the first question, we agree with Mr. Verma that it is not necessary to answer the second question on the facts of this case.
Issues:
1. Exemption under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for an association of hotel owners. 2. Requirement of notice of accumulation of income under section 11(2) of the Act and rule 17 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. 3. Validity of the time limit prescribed in Form No. 10 under rule 17 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. 4. Compliance with the requirements of section 11 before completion of assessment. 5. Impact of failure to provide necessary information on the claim of exemption under section 11. Analysis: 1. The case involved an association of hotel owners seeking exemption under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, claiming income received for charitable purposes. The Income-tax Officer initially denied the exemption due to lack of registration under section 12A(a) and failure to give notice of income accumulation under section 11(2). 2. The High Court clarified that while section 11(2)(a) required written notice to the Income-tax Officer in the prescribed manner, rule 17 of the Rules did not specify a time limit. The High Court held that the time limit in Form No. 10, requiring the notice within six months, exceeded delegated authority, rendering it illegal. 3. The Revenue argued that even without a specified time limit, compliance with section 11(2) should occur within a reasonable period. The Supreme Court agreed, emphasizing the mandatory nature of section 11(2) and the necessity for the assessing authority to possess the required information before completing the assessment. 4. The Court highlighted the importance of providing necessary information under section 11 before the completion of assessment, as the assessing authority cannot exclude income from taxation without such details. Failure to comply with this requirement before assessment completion would render subsequent claims futile. 5. Ultimately, the Supreme Court reversed the High Court's decision in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the need for timely compliance with section 11 requirements before assessment completion. The Court ruled that failure to furnish the required information before assessment completion would preclude the assessee from claiming the benefit of exemption under section 11, without the need for assessment reopening. In conclusion, the judgment focused on the mandatory nature of compliance with section 11 requirements before assessment completion, highlighting the significance of providing necessary information to the assessing authority within a reasonable period for claiming exemption under the Income-tax Act.
|