Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases IBC IBC + Tri IBC - 2021 (2) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (2) TMI 1002 - Tri - IBC


Issues:
1. Extension of CIRP period under Section 12(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 due to lockdown.
2. Applicability of orders by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and National Company Law Appellate Tribunal regarding extension of limitation periods.
3. Interpretation and application of Regulations inserted by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Analysis:
1. The case involved a request for an extension of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) period by 90 days beyond the initial 180 days due to the impact of the lockdown. The Resolution Professional of the Corporate Debtor filed an Interim Application (IA) seeking this extension under Section 12(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, citing the inability to complete the resolution process within the stipulated time frame because of the lockdown.

2. The Committee of Creditors of the Corporate Debtor passed a resolution seeking the extension of the CIRP period during a meeting held on 20.06.2020, with a significant voting share in favor of the extension. The IA highlighted the resolutions passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal regarding the extension of limitation periods due to the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, emphasizing the need to consider the lockdown period for calculating the CIRP timeline.

3. The judgment referenced the orders issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, which directed the exclusion of the lockdown period for the purpose of counting the period for the resolution process under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Additionally, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India introduced Regulations 40C and 47A, which specified that the lockdown period imposed by the Central Government should not be counted for the timeline of activities related to insolvency resolution and liquidation processes, respectively.

4. Considering the undisputed facts, the court allowed the IA seeking an extension of the CIRP period by 90 days, excluding the period from 25.03.2020 to 31.07.2020. The decision was based on the orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, and the Regulations issued by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India. The IA was disposed of accordingly, granting the requested extension to facilitate the completion of the resolution process for the Corporate Debtor.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates