Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2021 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (8) TMI 168 - AT - Central Excise


Issues involved:
1. Refusal to sanction interest on a refunded amount.
2. Interpretation of Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 regarding interest on delayed refunds.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Refusal to sanction interest on a refunded amount
The appeal arose from the rejection of an appellant's request for interest on a refunded amount. The appellant, engaged in the manufacture of Pan Masala, had filed abatement claims of Central Excise duty, which were initially rejected but later sanctioned by the Commissioner (Appeals). The appellant requested interest on the refunded amount, which was denied by the Department on the grounds of timely refund application. The appellant contended that interest liability accrues from the date of the original application, not the date of final sanction. The Department argued that since the refund was sanctioned within three months of the application, there was no obligation to pay interest. The Tribunal noted the discrepancy and analyzed the relevant legal provisions.

Issue 2: Interpretation of Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act
The Tribunal delved into the interpretation of Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, which governs interest on delayed refunds. The section mandates payment of interest if a duty ordered to be refunded is not repaid within three months from the date of the refund application. The Tribunal emphasized that interest liability commences from the date of the application under Section 11B. Citing legal precedents, including judgments from various High Courts, the Tribunal clarified that interest becomes payable after three months from the application date, irrespective of the final refund order date. The Tribunal highlighted that the Department's refusal to sanction interest was unjustifiable, especially when the appellant had requested interest in writing post-refund sanction. Relying on legal principles and precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the Department was obligated to pay interest along with the refunded amount, overturning the rejection of interest by the Commissioner (Appeals).

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order that denied interest on the refunded amount. The judgment underscored the statutory obligation under Section 11BB to pay interest on delayed refunds, emphasizing the application date as the trigger for interest accrual. The detailed analysis of legal provisions and precedents provided clarity on the matter, ensuring a fair and just resolution in favor of the appellant.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates