Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2021 (9) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (9) TMI 53 - HC - GST


Issues:
Challenge to order cancelling registration under Tripura Goods and Services Tax Act and Central Goods and Services Tax Act.

Analysis:
The petitioner, a company providing goods on rental basis, challenged an order cancelling its registration under Tripura Goods and Services Tax Act and Central Goods and Services Tax Act. The petitioner had registered under CGST and State GST Acts and entered into rental agreements with customers, purchasing goods for renting purposes. The Superintendent of Taxes issued a show-cause notice on 06.12.2020 for non-compliance, leading to the cancellation of registration effective from 01.07.2017. The petitioner responded, highlighting compliance with tax payments and filing returns. Despite the petitioner's cooperation and submissions, the Superintendent of Taxes passed the impugned order on 23.04.2021, canceling registration and imposing tax liabilities.

The Superintendent's order lacked specific grounds for cancellation, merely citing non-compliance without detailing the provisions or breaches leading to cancellation. The Court emphasized the importance of natural justice in issuing show-cause notices, requiring clear grounds for the noticee to respond adequately. Referring to a similar case, the Court highlighted the necessity of specifying reasons for cancellation, ensuring a fair hearing and preventing arbitrary actions. The Superintendent's order was criticized for delving into irrelevant legal issues, exceeding the scope of the case, and lacking clarity in reasoning and conclusions.

The Court set aside the impugned order dated 23.04.2021, canceling the petitioner's registration, and the associated tax demands. It emphasized the need for proper assessment and adherence to natural justice principles in future proceedings. The judgment allowed the petitioner's challenge, disposing of the petition and any pending applications. The Court's decision protected the petitioner's right to a fair process and highlighted the Superintendent's obligation to provide clear grounds for cancellation and adhere to legal principles in tax-related matters.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates