Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2021 (11) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (11) TMI 390 - AAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Whether a tax invoice can be issued from the Bengaluru office for imports received at Chennai Sea Port and directly sold to customers in other states, or if separate registration is required at the place of importation.
2. Whether transactions can be conducted using Karnataka GSTIN, and the correctness of mentioning Karnataka GSTIN and Chennai Sea Port as the place of dispatch in the e-way bill.
3. Eligibility for input tax credit under Section 16(2) of the CGST Act when goods are directly transported to customers without being physically received at the applicant's premises.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Issuance of Tax Invoice and Registration Requirement:
The applicant sought clarification on whether they could raise a tax invoice from their registered office in Bengaluru for goods imported at Chennai Sea Port and directly sold to customers in other states, or if they needed separate registration in Tamil Nadu. The ruling referred to Section 22(1) of the CGST/KGST Act, which mandates registration in the state from where taxable supplies are made. However, since the applicant does not have a place of business or fixed establishment in Tamil Nadu, the ruling concluded that separate registration at the place of importation is not required. The applicant can issue a tax invoice with IGST for interstate transactions as per Section 20 of the IGST Act 2017, read with Section 31 of the CGST Act 2017, when goods are directly dispatched from the port of import.

2. Conducting Transactions Using Karnataka GSTIN and E-Way Bill:
The applicant queried if they could use their Karnataka GSTIN for transactions and include Karnataka GSTIN and Chennai Sea Port as the place of dispatch in the e-way bill. The ruling affirmed that the applicant could conduct transactions using Karnataka GSTIN and correctly mention the GSTIN of Karnataka and the place of dispatch as Chennai Sea Port in the e-way bill. This is in line with the provisions that the place of supply of imported goods is the location of the importer, which, in this case, is Karnataka.

3. Eligibility for Input Tax Credit:
The applicant sought clarity on the availability of input tax credit under Section 16(2) of the CGST Act when goods are directly transported to customers without being physically received at their premises. The ruling referenced Section 16(2) and its explanation, which deems goods to be received by the registered person if they are delivered directly to a customer on the direction of the registered person. Thus, the applicant is eligible for input tax credit even if the goods are shipped directly to customers, provided they possess the necessary tax invoice or bill of entry documentation.

Ruling:
1. The applicant can issue a tax invoice with IGST for interstate transactions from their registered place of business in Karnataka without needing separate registration at the place of importation.
2. The applicant can use Karnataka GSTIN for transactions and correctly mention Karnataka GSTIN and Chennai Sea Port as the place of dispatch in the e-way bill.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates