Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2021 (12) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (12) TMI 215 - AAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Whether preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR) and providing Project Management Consultancy (PMC) services under Beneficiary Led Construction in Lucknow Cluster under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna (Urban) falls under activities related to functions entrusted to Panchayats or Municipalities under Article 243G or Article 243W of the Constitution of India.
2. Whether such services qualify as "Pure Services" and are exempt from GST under Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate).

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Classification under Article 243G/243W
The applicant, a registered assessee under GST, sought an advance ruling on whether their services for preparing Detailed Project Reports (DPR) and providing Project Management Consultancy (PMC) under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna (Urban) for the State Urban Development Agency (SUDA) fall under activities related to functions entrusted to Panchayats or Municipalities under Article 243G or 243W of the Constitution of India.

The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) examined the role and establishment of SUDA, noting it was formed under the Societies Registration Act and is a governmental authority as defined under section 2(16) of the Integrated Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017. SUDA's main objectives include identifying urban poor, formulating and implementing schemes for their upliftment, and reviewing the progress and effectiveness of these schemes. Given these functions, the AAR concluded that SUDA's activities align with the functions entrusted to Panchayats and Municipalities under Articles 243G and 243W, such as urban planning, poverty alleviation, and slum improvement.

Issue 2: Qualification as "Pure Services" and GST Exemption
The second issue was whether the services provided by the applicant qualify as "Pure Services" and are thus exempt from GST under Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate). The AAR reviewed the scope of work under the agreement, which included tasks such as physical verification, data collection, preparation of architectural designs, project structuring, and obtaining necessary approvals. The Project Management Consultancy (PMC) services involved coordinating and monitoring construction activities, ensuring quality control, and assisting beneficiaries at various stages of construction.

The AAR determined that these services qualify as "Pure Services" since they exclude works contract services or other composite supplies involving goods. Therefore, these services are exempt from GST under Serial No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28 June 2017, and the corresponding notifications under the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

Ruling:
1. The services rendered under the contract with SUDA and for PMAY are in relation to functions entrusted to Municipalities under Article 243W and to Panchayats under Article 243G of the Constitution of India.
2. Such services qualify as "Pure Services" and are exempt from GST, covered under Serial No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28 June 2017, and the corresponding notifications under the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

Validity:
This ruling is valid within the jurisdiction of the Authority for Advance Ruling Uttar Pradesh and subject to provisions under Section 103 (2) of the CGST Act, 2017, until declared void under Section 104 (1) of the Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates