Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2022 (5) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (5) TMI 1191 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues:
1. Taxability of Gudakhu under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 (OST Act).
2. Exemption of Gudakhu from sales tax under Entry 38 of the exempted list.

Analysis:
1. The petitioner, engaged in the manufacturing and sale of Gudakhu, sought exemption from sales tax under Entry 38 of the exemption list of the OST Act, citing that Gudakhu falls under tobacco as described in the ADE Act. The assessing authority imposed sales tax on Gudakhu, stating it might be covered under "other manufactures of Tobacco" in the ADE Act but not under Entry-38 of the OST Act. The Tribunal upheld this decision, denying the exemption claim as Gudakhu was not specifically mentioned in the ADE Act's first schedule.

2. The High Court analyzed the definition of tobacco under the ADE Act, noting that Gudakhu falls under Chapter Heading 2404.99 as "Tobacco used for smoking through hookah or chillum commonly known as hookah tobacco or Gudakhu." The court highlighted subsequent amendments recognizing Gudakhu as a tobacco product under both the OST Act and the ADE Act. Referring to precedent cases, the court emphasized that Gudakhu is considered a tobacco product in common parlance, exempt from sales tax under the OST Act. Citing the Supreme Court's rulings on similar products, the court concluded that Gudakhu is covered by Entry 38 of the exemption list and exempt from sales tax.

3. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that Gudakhu is indeed a form of tobacco covered by the ADE Act and exempt from sales tax under the OST Act. The Tribunal's decision, along with the orders of the ACST and the Assessing Officer, was set aside. The judgment clarified the legal position and factual understanding that Gudakhu qualifies as tobacco, thereby resolving the issues raised in the revision petitions in favor of the petitioner.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates