Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2022 (8) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (8) TMI 919 - AAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Whether the transaction of transfer of right to do integration testing, install, and market software between two cost centers of the same entity is leviable to GST.
2. If yes, whether such supply is considered as goods or services.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. GST Levy on Transaction Between Cost Centers:
The applicant sought clarity on whether the transaction of transferring the right to do integration testing, install, and market software from the Tamil Nadu cost center to the Karnataka cost center is subject to GST. The applicant argued that since both cost centers are part of the same legal entity, the transaction should not qualify as a supply under GST. However, the ruling clarified that for GST purposes, different cost centers with separate GST registrations are considered distinct persons. The transaction involves a recurring consideration, which qualifies as a supply under Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017. The transfer of rights for integration testing, installation, and marketing of software is a supply made for consideration and in the course of business, thus falling within the ambit of GST.

2. Classification of Supply as Goods or Services:
The ruling further examined whether the supply should be classified as goods or services. The applicant's vehicles are manufactured by the Tamil Nadu cost center and distributed across India, while the performance upgrade software is developed and marketed by the Karnataka cost center. The software is sold separately as an optional upgrade to enhance the vehicle's performance. The transaction between the cost centers involves the Tamil Nadu cost center agreeing to allow the Karnataka cost center to install and market the software. This activity is classified as a supply of services, not goods, as it involves the right to perform certain actions rather than the transfer of tangible items.

Conclusion:
The ruling concluded that the transaction of transferring the right to do integration testing, install, and market software between the Tamil Nadu and Karnataka cost centers is leviable to GST. Furthermore, the supply involved is classified as a supply of services. Thus, the applicant must comply with GST regulations for such transactions between distinct persons within the same legal entity.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates