Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2022 (8) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (8) TMI 971 - AAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Whether the services provided under a service contract for agricultural extension services are exempt under a specific notification.
2. If not exempt under the first notification, whether such services are exempt under any other notification.

Analysis:
1. The applicant, a registered person under GST Law, entered into a service contract with a public charitable trust to provide agricultural extension services for tree-based agriculture to farmers. The applicant sought an advance ruling to determine if the services provided fall under the exemption category of a specific notification. The applicant's interpretation was based on the definition of "agriculture extension services" under the relevant notification.
2. The service contract involved appointing Agriculture Extension Workers (AEWs) to educate and train farmers on agro-forestry using scientific research and knowledge. The workers collected farmer information, facilitated sapling pickup, monitored tree plantation, and collaborated with government departments for various schemes. The applicant's activities were detailed in the service contract, focusing on promoting tree-based agriculture and supporting farmers at various stages.
3. During the personal hearing, the applicant's representative reiterated the facts presented in the application. The authority clarified that the provisions of the CGST Act and the KGST Act are similar in most aspects. The authority considered the submissions, facts, and arguments presented by the applicant before making its decision.
4. The authority examined the service contract and the activities conducted by the applicant through appointed workers. It was observed that the services provided, including education, training, and support for agro-forestry, fell under the definition of agricultural extension services as per the relevant notification. The authority referenced specific clauses from the service contract to highlight the applicant's involvement in various aspects of promoting tree-based agriculture.
5. Based on the definition of agricultural extension services and the nature of activities performed by the applicant, the authority concluded that the services provided were indeed covered under agricultural extension services and thus exempted under the relevant notification. The authority ruled in favor of the applicant, stating that the services fell under the exemption category specified in the notification. The second question regarding exemption under another notification was deemed redundant, given the affirmative answer to the first question.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates