Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2022 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (11) TMI 849 - HC - Indian Laws


Issues:
Challenge to judgment of conviction and order on sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Settlement and compromise between the parties under Section 147 of the N.I. Act. Payment of graded cost as per guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court in Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H.

Analysis:
The revision petition was filed challenging the conviction and sentence passed by the Trial Court under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Both parties, through their counsels, filed a joint application under Section 147 of the N.I. Act, stating that they have settled the matter amicably and have compromised. The petitioner acknowledged paying Rs. 2,75,000 to the respondent as a full settlement, with a Demand Draft for Rs. 1,00,000 and allowing the respondent to withdraw the remaining Rs. 1,75,000 deposited in the Trial Court.

The Court noted the settlement and the receipt of the Demand Draft by the respondent, confirming the amicable resolution. It was established that both parties consented to the settlement voluntarily. The Court, considering the joint application and submissions made, allowed the parties to compound the offence under Section 147 of the N.I. Act, subject to the payment of graded cost by the petitioner.

Referring to the guidelines set by the Supreme Court in Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H, the Court emphasized the requirement for the accused to pay 15% of the cheque amount as graded cost. In this case, with a cheque amount of Rs. 2,50,000, the graded cost was determined to be Rs. 37,500. The petitioner deposited the required amount through a Demand Draft, which was accepted by the Court.

Based on the joint application, the guidelines from the Supreme Court, and the circumstances of the case, the Court allowed the compounding of the offence under Section 147 of the N.I. Act. Consequently, the petitioner was acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, and the revision petition was disposed of. The Court directed the Registry to transmit copies of the order to both the Trial Court and the Sessions Judge's Court for necessary action.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates