Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2022 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (12) TMI 1205 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
- Challenge to the first appellate order concerning Assessment Year 2014-15 under Section 143(3) of the Act r.w. Section 144C r.w. Section 144B.
- Dismissal of grounds of appeal by the CIT(A) regarding assessment order being bad in law and nature, disallowances made under various sections, and confirmation of purchases as bogus.
- Challenge by the Revenue against deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer related to vehicle maintenance expenses, delayed payment of employee's contribution, club fees of directors, and unexplained credits received as share application money and share premium money.
- Bar of limitation for passing the assessment order due to unauthorized reference to TPO under Section 92CA(3) of the Act.

Detailed Analysis:
1. The Assessee challenged the first appellate order, raising various grounds including the order being bad in law due to limitations, additions made without following natural justice, and the CIT(A) ignoring relevant provisions and instructions. The Assessee also contested disallowances under different sections and the confirmation of purchases as bogus, providing detailed explanations and submissions to support their case.

2. The Revenue contested the deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer, including vehicle maintenance expenses, delayed employee contributions, club fees of directors, and unexplained credits as share application and premium money. The Revenue argued that the CIT(A) erred in deleting these additions without proper substantiation from the Assessee.

3. The main issue addressed was the bar of limitation for passing the assessment order due to an unauthorized reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) under Section 92CA(3) of the Act. The Assessee contended that the reference to TPO was invalid as the transactions did not meet the threshold monetary limit of Rs.5 crore, rendering the TPO's order as null and void. The Tribunal found merit in the Assessee's argument, concluding that the assessment order was barred by limitation and should be quashed.

4. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, allowing their appeal, while dismissing the Revenue's appeal. The assessment order was deemed bad in law due to the bar of limitation, making other grounds of challenges irrelevant. The decision was pronounced in open court on 26/05/2022.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates